检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘香军 王牧 Pan Xiangjun;Wang Mu(Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084)
机构地区:[1]清华大学,北京100084
出 处:《天津行政学院学报》2024年第6期65-75,共11页Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“通过政府移风易俗的习惯法变迁研究”(24AFX003);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“基层治理中的自治规范研究”(63242132)。
摘 要:当代村规民约存在表面嵌入乡土社会而实际脱嵌的现象,须从形式嵌入向实质融入转变。D区29个行政村中的村规民约实施情况表明,村规民约的实效性转化经历了规范调适、资源吸纳与权威重塑三个阶段。村规民约兼具问题性、本土性、具象性,能有效吸收团体、党政、市场等内外资源,在程序和结果两个方面具有权威性。同时,实效性转化的进路受到制度建构机制、关系整合机制与认知引导机制三重逻辑的驱动,村规民约由此从文本上的规则转变为融入日常行动的规范,在乡村治理中发挥实效性作用,实现了国家和社会的深度互嵌,提升了乡村治理效能。The contemporary village regulations exhibit a phenomenon of superficial embedding in the local society while actually being disembodied,which need a transformation from weak embeddedness to substantive integration.An analysis of the implementation of rural regulations in 29 villages of D District reveals that the practical effectiveness transformation involves three processes:normative adjustment,resource absorption,and authority reshaping.These endow the village regulations with problem orientation,local specificity,and concreteness,effectively assimilating internal and external resources including community groups,party and government,as well as market,thus reshaping authority in both procedural and outcome aspects.Meanwhile,the path of practical effectiveness transformation is driven by the triple logic of institutional construction mechanism,relationship integration mechanism,and cognitive guidance mechanism.Consequently,village regulations have transformed from textual rules to pragmatic norms integrated into daily actions,playing a significant role in rural governance and achieving deep interweaving between the state and society,and enhancing rural governance efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.10.2