股权代持司法裁判困局的路径厘清  

Clarifying the Path of the Dilemma of Judicial Adjudication of Equity Ownership

作　　者：项贤国 赵建国 刘荣英 XIANG Xian-guo;ZHAO Jian-guo;LIU Rong-ying(School of Law,Suqian College,Suqian 223800,Jiangsu,China;People’s Court of Jingxian,Hengshui,Hebei.Jingxian 053599,Hebei,China)

机构地区：[1]宿迁学院法律系,江苏宿迁223800 [2]河北省衡水市景县人民法院,河北景县053599

出　　处：《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2024年第4期63-67,共5页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators

基　　金：2022-2023年度最高人民法院司法案例研究课题“股权代持类纠纷案例实证研究”(项目编号:2023SFAL016)的阶段性成果;2024年度宿迁学院司法案例研究中心委托课题“法院实证项目合作研究”的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：股权代持行为存在一系列的法律风险,实践中有关股权代持纠纷的司法裁判规则尚不统一,以相关理论为基础,通过整理、归纳和分析选定的股权代持类纠纷的典型裁判案例,分析裁判困境,继而基于股权代持双方的权利义务、股权代持协议无效的法律后果、股东资格认定的证据制度和股权代持协议的公证制度四个方面,研究各级法院在审理股权代持类纠纷案例时的裁判路径。There are a series of legal risks in the behavior of equity ownership,and the judicial rules of equity ownership disputes are not uniform in practice.Based on the relevant theories,through sorting out,summarizing and analyzing the typical cases of selected equity ownership disputes,the judgment dilemma is analyzed.Besides,based on the rights and obligations of both parties,the legal consequences of the invalidity of the agreement,the evidence system of shareholder qualification and the notarization system of the agreement,this paper studies the adjudication path of courts at all levels in dealing with disputes of equity ownership.

关 键 词：股权代持 隐名股东 裁判困局 裁判规则 

分 类 号：DF411.91[政治法律—经济法学]