检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东大学法学院 [2]山东省青岛市人民检察院
出 处:《清华法律评论》2023年第2期93-109,共17页Tsinghua Law Review
摘 要:我国学界和实务界对贿赂类犯罪中“谋取不正当利益”构成要件的内涵界定一直存在争论,目前的各类观点无法有效解决司法实践中遇到的问题。解决该问题的前提是界定清楚贿赂类犯罪所保护的法益,即国家工作人员职务行为的公正性。站在这一立场之上,“谋取不正当利益”构成要件不应该被删除,而应进一步界定其具体内涵,将利用“程序不正当”谋取利益的情况也纳入其中。这样理解能够合理解决司法实践中的疑难案例,但要避免陷入无限扩张解释的错误,而应同时对该构成要件内涵作出合理限定。There have been debates in Chinas academic and practical communities on the definition of the constitutive requirements of“seeking improper benefits”in bribery offences,and the current viewpoints are unable to effectively solve the problems encountered in judicial practice.The prerequisite for solving this problem is to clearly define the legal interest protected by the bribery offence,i.e.the impartiality of the officialbehaviour of State officials.From this standpoint,the constitutive requirements of“seeking improper benefits”should not be deleted,but its specific connotation should be further defined to include the use of“procedural impropriety”to seek advantage.Such an understanding can reasonably resolve difficult cases in judicial practice,but it is important to avoid falling into the error of unlimited expansion of interpretation,and should at the same time provide a reasonable limitation of the connotation of the constituent element.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.2.133