证据学视域下评价中医理论类古籍内容的思路  

Idea of evaluating the contents of ancient Chinese medical books from the perspective of evidence law

作　　者：吴上斌 吴宇峰 杨婕 孙文奇 曹娜 靳瑞琦 邱丽颖 黄俊伟 王维广 陈子杰 翟双庆 WU Shangbin;WU Yufeng;YANG Jie;SUN Wenqi;CAO Na;JIN Ruiqi;QIU Liying;HUANG Junwei;WANG Weiguang;CHEN Zijie;ZHAI Shuangqing(School of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学中医学院,北京100029

出　　处：《中华中医药杂志》2024年第11期5969-5972,共4页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy

基　　金：科技部科技基础资源调查专项(No.2022FY102002);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.2022-JYB-JBZR-011)。

摘　　要：中医理论类古籍内容是中医古籍中的重要组成部分,蕴含丰富的研究价值,目前学界尚未建立对此类古籍内容质量进行评价的方法。证据学与中医理论类古籍在认知特征上存有相似之处,借鉴其中证据类型、论证层次及论证特征理论,尝试建立专适于中医理论类古籍的评价方法,设置证据自身和证据载体2个评价方向,证据完整度、证据应用强度、证据逻辑强度、证据载体性质和证据载体影响力5个评价维度,共15个条目开展质量评价工作,以期为中医古籍研究提供新方法,扩展新思路。The content of ancient books on traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)theory is an important part of ancient TCM books and contains rich research value,and at present,the academic community has not established a method to evaluate the quality of the content of such ancient books.There are similarities in the cognitive characteristics of evidence science and ancient books of TCM theory,and by drawing on the types of evidence,the level of argument and the theory of demonstration characteristics.We try to establish an evaluation method suitable for ancient books of TCM theory,and set up two evaluation directions of evidence itself and evidence carrier.A total of 15 items carried out quality evaluation in five evaluation dimensions:evidence completeness,evidence application intensity,evidence logic strength,evidence carrier nature and evidence carrier influence,in order to provide new methods and expand new ideas for the research of ancient Chinese medicine books.

关 键 词：中医古籍 循证医学 证据学 评价方法 

分 类 号：R2-03[医药卫生—中医学]