当代法律推理研究的三个转向  

Add to Favorite Three Shifts in the Study of Contemporary Legal Reasoning

作　　者：张保生 ZHANG Baosheng(Key Laboratory of Evidence Law and Forensic Science of the Ministry of Education/Institute of Evidence Law and Forensic Science,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 102249,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学证据科学教育部重点实验室/证据科学研究院,北京102249

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第6期23-39,共17页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：当代法律推理研究的三个转向:第一个是从法律逻辑向司法制度的研究转向,可分为两个阶段,一是从三段论演绎逻辑向现代“法律逻辑系统”的演变,二是从思维逻辑向审判制度的演变;第二个是从制度客体到推理主体的研究转向,可分为三个阶段,一是从制度分析到过程分析的研究转变,二是从法官主体向主体系统的研究转变,三是从认知偏差到思维结构的研究转变;第三个是从实质推理到事实认定的研究转向,这打破了法律推理研究偏重法律适用、忽视事实认定的偏向,也打通了证据法学与法理学的界限。There are three shifts in the study of contemporary legal reasoning:The first is from the study of legal logic to the study of judicial system,which can be divided into two stages,the evolution from syllogistic deduction logic to modern“legal logic system”and the evolution from thinking logic to trial system.The second is from institutional object to reasoning subject,which can be divided into three stages:one is from institutional analysis to process analysis,another is from judge subject to subject system,and a third is from cognitive prejudice to thinking structure.The third is the shift from substantive reasoning to fact-finding,which breaks the bias of legal reasoning study favoring the application of law and ignoring the fact-finding,and also breaks the boundary between evidence law and jurisprudence.

关 键 词：法律推理 审判制度 推理主体 实质推理 事实认定 

分 类 号：D90-051[政治法律—法学理论]