检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付磊 李艳丽 江建勋[2] 王小霞 张子帷 梅勇[1] 辜伟伟[2] FU Lei;LI Yan-li;JIANG Jian-xun;WANG Xiao-xia;ZHANG Zi-wei;MEI Yong;GU Wei-wei(School of Medicine,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan,Hubei 430070,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]武汉科技大学医学院,湖北武汉430070 [2]十堰市疾病预防控制中心
出 处:《环境与健康杂志》2024年第10期907-911,共5页Journal of Environment and Health
摘 要:目的了解十堰市宾馆卫生现状,评价健康风险,为加强公共场所卫生管理和防控疾病提供依据和技术支持。方法收集2019年9—11月市区18家宾馆的三轮监测数据,用公共场所卫生标准进行评价,并用Excel 2010、SPSS 22.0等进行统计分析。结果宾馆从业人员呼吸系统患病率最高(27.36%)。宾馆总体合格率为94.96%,在28项监测指标中毛巾及床单的pH值合格率最低(分别为9.50%和0.56%),其次为室内空气甲醛浓度及噪声(分别为23.46%和34.57%);温度、相对湿度、噪声、室内空气指标(除甲醛外)、毛巾和床单的pH值以及其菌落总数在不同月份间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。比较不同级别宾馆(三星级及以上、三星级以下及快捷酒店)发现,温度、相对湿度、噪声、室内甲醛及真菌总数、毛巾pH值及菌落总数的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且并非宾馆级别越高,环境有害因素水平越低。结论本次调查的宾馆多项指标合格率较低,健康危害因素在不同时间、不同宾馆级别间存在差异,今后应加强卫生宣传、提高管理者的卫生意识和管理水平,并加大卫生监测频次。Objective To understand the hygienic status of the hotels in Shiyan City,Hubei province and the health risks,and provide the basis and technical support for strengthening health management and prevention and control of disease in our province and the national public places.Methods Three monitoring data were collected from September 2019 to November urban 18 hotels,evaluated with public health standards,and analyzed by Microsoft Excel 2010,SPSS 22.0.Results The prevalence of the respiratory system diseases in hotel practitioners was the highest(27.36%).The overall pass rate of the hotels was 94.96%.The pH value of towels and bed sheets was the lowest(9.50%and 0.56%),followed by indoor air formaldehyde concentration and noise(23.46 and 34.57%)in 28 monitoring indicators.The temperature,humidity,noise,indoor air indicators(except formaldehyde),the pH value and the total number of colonies of towels and bed sheets was significantly different in different month(P<0.05).The temperature,humidity,noise,indoor formaldehyde and the total number of fungi,towels pH and total number of colonies had significant difference(P<0.05)in the hotels with different star levels(three-star and above,the three-star the following and budget hotels),and not a hotel higher level,the lower the level of harmful environmental factors.Conclusion The hotel indicators qualified rate is low and the problem is serious,there are differences of health risk factors in different time and different hotel level,we should strengthen health education to improve the management of health awareness and management level,and increase the frequency of health monitoring.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30