延续与断裂:中国高校学报传统再议——基于中西学术期刊传统的比较  

Continuity and Rupture:Rethinking the Tradition of University Journals in China--Based on a Comparison of the Traditions of Chinese and Western Academic Journals

作　　者：朱剑 仲伟民 Zhu Jian;Zhong Weimin(Editorial Department of Journal of Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093;Editorial Department of Journal of Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084)

机构地区：[1]南京大学学报编辑部,江苏南京210093 [2]清华大学学报编辑部,北京100084

出　　处：《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2024年第6期165-183,共19页Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences

摘　　要：作为学术期刊传统的源头,《哲学汇刊》诸多开创性贡献为后世欧美学术期刊所传承,并随着西方学术的传播,在一定程度上形塑了后发国家的学术期刊。承续了其传播学术基本使命的中国高校学报,并不是对西方学术期刊的直接移植,而是修改了某些基因,将学术期刊与学术共同体的关系嫁接到了与主办学校的关系上。这就使作为学术期刊的学报本应具有的公共平台属性转变成了主办学校的窗口和园地,冠以校名的刊名、综合性和内向性成为既是必然的也是唯一的选择。这样的“转基因”对同样在童年时期的大学的成长及其公共形象的构建极有意义,学报对早期大学的成长所作出的贡献是不可替代和磨灭的。然而,这也给学报自身的成长带来了困难和障碍。尽管1930年代曾有过向开放的专业刊转型的尝试,但学报并没能从总体上告别童年。窗口与园地的定位与公共平台属性之间的紧张和冲突终究是无法避免的,结果在数次大学命运转折的历史关头,前者无一例外地压倒了后者,学报不得不一直停留在初始状态,而从1970年代末开始更是以制度的形式将此状态固定下来。随着1990年代对标国际的世界高水平大学建设的启动,竞争在国际学术平台层面展开,牺牲了公共平台属性、割断了与学术共同体血脉联系的学报已跟不上大学前进的步伐,终于逐渐走向边缘化。As the source of the academic journal tradition,many of the pioneering contributions of Philosophical Transactions were inherited by later European and American academic journals,and with the spread of Western academics,it has shaped the academic journals of late-developing countries to a certain extent.The Chinese university journals,which have inherited the basic mission of spreading academics,are not a direct transplant of Western academic journals,but have modified some genes,grafting the relationship between academic journals and academic communities onto the relationship with the host universities.This has transformed the public platform attributes that academic journals should have into a window and garden for the host universities.To name the journal with the university title and the comprehensiveness and introversion have become both inevitable and the only choice.Such“transgenic”is extremely meaningful to the growth of universities in their childhood and the construction of their public image.The contribution made by journals to the growth of early universities is irreplaceable and indelible.However,this has also brought difficulties and obstacles to the development of the journals themselves.Although there were attempts to transform themselves into open professional journals in the 1930s,the journals have not been able to bid farewell to their childhood as a whole.The tension and conflict between the positioning of windows and gardens and the attributes of public platforms are ultimately unavoidable.As a result,at several historical junctures when the fate of universities changed,the former overwhelmed the latter without exception,and the journals had to remain in their initial state.Since the late 1970s,this state has been fixed through institutionalization.With the launch of constructing world-class universities in the 1990s,competition has unfolded at the level of international academic platforms.Journals that have sacrificed their public platform attributes and severed their blood ties with the

关 键 词：学报传统 《哲学汇刊》 《学桴》 综合性期刊 专业期刊 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]