检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛亮[1] 钟婷[1] XUE Liang;ZHONG Ting
机构地区:[1]上海图书馆(上海科学技术情报研究所),上海200031
出 处:《国际大都市发展研究(中英文)》2024年第2期38-56,共19页
摘 要:以国际大都市行政区划为规模口径,以GDP和人均GDP为分析对象,通过对比21世纪以来20余年的发展数据,呈现国际大都市竞争格局的变化。研究表明,这种竞争格局的“不变”在于纽约、东京始终是最稳固的两强,也是最早跨过千亿、万亿美元级GDP的卓越城市;“变化”在于中国城市的强势崛起,尤其是上海。然而,上海的人均GDP虽然增长迅速,但与巴黎、纽约等国际大都市仍存在较大差距。因此,充分依托创新的主导作用,积极发展新质生产力,努力摆脱对传统经济增长方式和生产力发展路径的依赖,仍是今后一段时期推动我国大都市高质量发展的核心要务。Based on the scale of the administrative division of international metropolises and the analysis of GDP and GDP per capita,this paper presents the changes of the competitive pattern of international metropolises by comparing the development data since the 21st century.The study shows that the“constant”of this competition pattern lies in the fact that New York and Tokyo have always been the most solid two strongest cities,and also the earliest to exceed the GDP of 100 billion and trillion dollars.The“change”lies in the strong rise of Chinese cities,especially Shanghai.On the other hand,although Shanghai's GDP per capita has grown rapidly,there is still a huge gap compared with Paris and New York.This paper argues that relying fully on the leading role of innovation,actively developing quality productive forces,and endeavoring to get rid of the dependence on traditional mode of economic growth and productivity development paths remain the core priorities for promoting the high-quality development of China's metropolises in the coming period.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42