检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李军[1] 慕小璐 LI Jun;MU Xiao-lu
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军西部战区第一军事法院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2024年第11期46-51,共6页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
摘 要:数字化经济是实现中国式现代化的重要举措,为社会经济发展带来重大机遇,也为个人信息保护带来诸多新挑战。司法治理作为数字经济治理体系不可或缺的重要组成部分,在个人信息保护领域发挥着积极作用。当前,司法实践遭受数字经济的冲击,呈现法律边界划定模糊、法律文本适用争议和特殊群体保护缺位等局限。需要通过在法律边界空白领域适当扩大法律渊源、在法律适用时允许适度的法官造法和完善特殊群体个人信息保护政策机制来弥合传统司法实践与现实困境的鸿沟。The digital economy is a crucial measure for achieving Chinese-style modernization,bringing significant opportunities for socio-economic development and posing numerous new challenges to personal information protection.Judicial governance,as an indispensable component of the digital economy governance system,plays an active role in the field of personal information protection.Currently,judicial practice is impacted by the digital economy,presenting limitations such as vague delineation of legal boundaries,disputes over the application of legal texts,and lack of protection for special groups.To bridge the gap between traditional judicial practice and realworld dilemmas,it is necessary to appropriately expand legal sources in areas where legal boundaries are unclear,allow moderate judge-made law in legal application,and improve policy mechanisms for personal information protection of special groups.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.219