乾隆八年《大清律例》的编纂思路与立法分流研究  

Rethinking the 1743 Great Qing Code:Its Codification and Legislative Division

作　　者：姜金顺 JIANG Jinshun

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学人文学院,102249

出　　处：《史林》2024年第5期143-154,219,共13页Historical Review

基　　金：中国政法大学校级青年科研项目“乾隆朝清宫藏省例档案的搜集、整理与研究”(项目批准号:22ZFQ77001);国家社科基金一般项目“清代中期法律变革与国家治理研究”(项目批准号:21BZS072)阶段性成果;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助。

摘　　要：乾隆八年《大清律例》存在闭门修律、开门修律两种编纂思路。通过这两种方式,省级官员、刑部官员获得了参与中央立法的权力。作为立法分流的证据,相对于重情立法,细事立法(特别是实体法)并不属于乾隆朝的重点立法领域;很多细事立法建议虽然得到乾隆帝的同意,并且影响了特定地域的法律实践,但是未必会被整合进《大清律例》,而是以其他形态继续存在。The present paper,reexamining the creation of the 1743 Great Qing Code,argues that,due to the dual method of codification,i.e.,the combination of close-door and open-door discussion,the provincial governors and senior members of the Board of Justice were empowered to partake in the central legislation and meanwhile,as the central authorities did not pay great attention to the substantive law,many relevant proposals were actually not incorporated into theCode.

关 键 词：《大清律例》 编纂思路 立法分流 细事立法 

分 类 号：K249.3[历史地理—历史学]