检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张明楷[1] ZHANG Mingkai(Tsinghua University)
机构地区:[1]清华大学
出 处:《法学家》2024年第6期18-34,188,189,共19页The Jurist
摘 要:构建自主的刑法学知识体系,需要深入挖掘、合理吸收中华优秀传统文化的智慧结晶和精华,并对传统文化实现创造性转化与创新性发展。构建自主的刑法学知识体系与借鉴国外学说并不矛盾,刑法学界需要以开放的、自信的态度积极借鉴和吸收国外优秀的刑法理论成果,而不是排斥国外学说。构建自主的刑法学知识体系,需要妥当处理热点问题与基础理论的关系;基础理论是构建自主的刑法学知识体系的前提;没有基础理论研究作支撑,对热点问题的讨论只不过是低水平的不断重复。构建自主的刑法学知识体系需要在学术自由的前提下进行学术批判,应严格区分学术批判与学术干涉,不能以学术批判为由对他人的学术自由进行干涉;同时也需要正确处理学术争议与学术共识的关系,刑法学者虽然要有形成共识的意识,但不能因此放弃学术争议,自主的刑法学知识体系需要在不断地争议、不断地推翻旧的共识和形成新的共识的过程中构建与完善。To build an independent knowledge system of criminal jurisprudence,it is necessary to dig deeply and absorb reasonably the wisdom crystallization and essence of Chinese excellent traditional culture,and realize creative transformation and innovative development of traditional culture.There is no contradiction between building an independent knowledge system of criminal law and learning from theories of foreign criminal law.The academic circle of criminal law should actively learn from and absorb foreign excellent criminal law theories with an open and confident attitude,rather than rejecting foreign theories.To construct an independent knowledge system of criminal jurisprudence,it is necessary to properly deal with the relationship between hot issues and basic theories.The basic theory is the premise of constructing the independent knowledge system of criminal law.Without the support of basic theoretical research,the discussion of hot issues is only repetition at low-level.To construct an independent knowledge system of criminal law,it is necessary to conduct academic criticism under the atmosphere of academic freedom,but academic criticism and academic interference should be strictly distinguished,and no interference in others' academic freedom should be carried out under the disguise of academic criticism.To construct an independent knowledge system of criminal law,it is necessary to correctly handle the relationship between academic disputes and academic consensus.Although criminal law scholars should have the consciousness of forming consensus,they should not give up academic disputes as a price.An independent knowledge system of criminal law needs to be constructed and improved in the process of constantly disputing,overthrowing old consensus and forming new consensus.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170