检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张卓雅 高文渊 李晶[1] 官春燕 王淼[1] 米元元 黄海燕[2] ZHANG Zhuo-ya;GAO Wen-yuan;LI jing;GUAN Chun-yan;WANG Miao;MI Yuan-yuan;HUANG Hai-yan(Dept.of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China;Dept.of Critical Care Medicine,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China;School of Nursing,Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China)
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,湖北武汉430022 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院重症医学科,湖北武汉430022 [3]华中科技大学同济医学院护理学院,湖北武汉430022
出 处:《护理学报》2024年第22期35-40,共6页Journal of Nursing(China)
基 金:湖北省自然科学基金立项项目(2024AFB856)。
摘 要:目的制定声带器质性发声障碍患者围手术期嗓音康复审查指标,分析障碍因素,为证据的临床转化提供依据。方法以知识转化模式(knowledge to action framework,KTA)为理论指导,按照知识应用步骤:确定问题,组建循证小组和专家团队;将知识引入临床情景,综合函询和讨论制定审查指标及审查方法;根据基线审查结果基于渥太华研究应用模型(Ottawa Model of Research Use,OMRU),经头脑风暴法分析证据引入临床的障碍因素。结果共纳入15条最佳证据,制定13条审查指标及其方法;归纳分析出3方面的8条障碍因素,即基于证据变革方面2条、潜在采纳者3条及实践环境3条。结论本研究审查指标制定具有科学性和内容可行性,障碍因素评估具有科学性和内容新颖性,研究方法有借鉴作用,研究内容为证据转化提供依据。Objective To develop review indicators for perioperative voice rehabilitation in patients with vocal cord organic dysphonia,to analyze the obstacle factors,and to provide reference for the transformation of clinical evidence.Methods Guided by the knowledge to action framework(KTA)model,according to steps of knowledge application including identifying problems,establishing evidence-based groups and expert teams and introducing knowledge into clinical situation,review indicators and review methods were identified and formulated through consultation and discussion.According to the results of the baseline review,based on the OMRU model,the barriers to introducing evidence into clinical practice were analyzed by brainstorming method.Results A total of 15 pieces of best evidence were included,and 13 review indicators and review methods were identified and formulated.A total of 8 barriers including 2 in evidence reform,3 in potential adopter and 3 in practice environment were summarized.Conclusion The development of review indicators in this study is scientific and feasible,and the assessment of obstacles was scientific and novel.The research may provide reference for evidence transformation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33