检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李星余 LI Xingyu(School of Law,National University of Malaysia,Negeri Selangor 43600,Malaysia)
机构地区:[1]马来西亚国立大学法学院,马来西亚雪兰莪州43600
出 处:《楚雄师范学院学报》2024年第6期65-73,共9页Journal of Chuxiong Normal University
摘 要:文章探讨了少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策的适用,特别以大学生涉嫌“帮信罪”为典型案例进行讨论。首先厘清了该政策的核心要义及提出的时代背景,凸显了其在法治体系中的理论支撑和实践价值。通过对大学生“帮信罪”法律性质的解析以及司法实践所面临的难题剖析,强调了准确理解和严格落实少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策的重要性。文章提出了加强法治教育、提升司法人员素质、完善相关法律制度的建议,旨在推动司法实践中对少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策的精准适用,进而实现司法公正与效率的有机平衡。This article studies application of the criminal policy of not making large numbers of arrests,lawsuits and detentions regarding cases of on-line information assisting and abetting involving college students in particular.By elaborating on the core significance of the above policy and its background,the author first stresses its theoretical ground and practical value in the rule-of-law system before proceeding to stress the importance of accurate understanding and strict compliance with the aforesaid policy to be prudent in making arrests,lawsuits and detentions through an analysis of both the legal essence of the cyber crime of information assisting and abetting as well as relevant difficulties in judicial practice.To promote accurate application of the judicial policy of being prudent in making arrests,lawsuits and detentions in practice so as to ensure organic equilibrium between legal justice and efficiency,the paper finally suggests as measures strengthening legal education,improving quality of judicial personnel and perfecting related legal systems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.202.121