检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尤荣祥 YOU Rongxiang(Law school,Guangzhou College of Commerce,Guangzhou,Guangdong,511363)
出 处:《南京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第6期53-62,共10页Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金项目“数字时代算法风险侵权责任研究”(23BFX065)。
摘 要:线上取证模式是影响商标司法判决的重要因素之一。由于司法信息的封闭性,线上取证模式对司法审判影响的深度及结果的科学性有待考察。通过对广东省各级人民法院2020—2023年1067起第25类商标侵权案件一审判决书的研究分析发现,在控制其他相关因素不变的前提下,线上取证模式对于商标侵权案件的判决结果具有显著影响。造成商标侵权案件判决损害赔偿额降低的影响因素包括合理维权费用压缩、司法政策对于批量维权的引导、侵权规模限制等。尽管线上取证会导致判决额削减,但是对比线上取证本身的优势,这种削减的程度微不足道,并不妨碍当事人选择、采取线上取证模式。The online deposition mode is one of the important factors affecting the trademark-related judicial judgements.Due to the exclusivity of judicial information,the impact depths and the scientificity in case judgments through digital evidence collection are yet to be examined.This paper is based on an analysis to 1067 first-instance judgements of Class 25 trademark infringement cases in different levels of Guangdong Provincial People’s Courts.Under the premise of maintaining other relevant factors unchanged,the online deposition mode has a significant impact on the judgement results of trademark infringement cases.Factors affecting the amount of damages awarded in trademark infringement cases include the compression of reasonable costs in defending rights,the guidance of judicial policy concerning bulk legal actions,the limitation of the infringement scales,and so on.Compared to the advantages of the online deposition mode itself,although it reduces the judgement amount,the extent of this reduction is insignificant,and does not refrain the parties from choosing this mode.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127