科研论文代表作学术价值的生成机制、表现形式与测度策略研究  

On the Generating Mechanism, Manifestation and Measurement of Academic Value of Representative Research Papers

作　　者：董克 吴佳纯 DONG Ke;WU Jia-chun(Research Institute for Data Management&Innovation,Nanjing University,Suzhou,Jiangsu,215163,China;School of Information Management,Nanjing University,Nanjing,Jiangsu,210023,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学数据管理创新研究中心,江苏苏州215163 [2]南京大学信息管理学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《西华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第6期25-35,共11页Journal of Xihua University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“面向代表作评价的科研论文学术价值测度研究”(项目编号:21CTQ017)。

摘　　要：科研论文的学术价值是科研论文其他价值产生的基础,学术价值的测度是代表作评价的基础。文章在阐述科研论文代表作学术价值生成逻辑的基础上,从知识实体角度出发,讨论了科研论文代表作学术价值评价的三个基本问题:学术价值的生成机制、表现形式以及测度策略。研究认为,在生成机制层面,科研论文代表作学术价值以评价目标为指向,在表征创新逻辑与测度学术贡献的过程中生成;在表现形式上,学术价值主要通过不同知识实体及其组合来呈现,如自然科学/工程科学领域表现为“问题—方法—结果”,人文社会科学领域表现为“观点—验证—结论”;在测度策略上,应当综合微观的学术基础贡献、中观的学术共同体贡献以及宏观的学科体系贡献进行学术价值的系统评价。The academic value of research papers serves as the foundation for generating other forms of value,with the measurement of this value providing a basis for evaluating representative works.This study explores the academic value of such works by examining three core aspects from the perspective of knowledge entities:the mechanism of value generation,its manifestation,and strategies for measurement.It posits that the academic value of representative research papers is derived through the process of aligning innovation logic and assessing academic contributions according to specific evaluation goals.At the manifestation level,this academic value is primarily expressed through various knowledge structures,such as"problem-methods-results"in the natural and engineering sciences and"hypothesis-verification-conclusion"in the humanities and social sciences.Finally,at the level of measurement strategy,a systematic assessment of academic value should incorporate contributions across micro-level academic foundations,meso-level academic communities, and the macro-level disciplinary framework.

关 键 词：代表作评价 学术价值 知识实体 计量策略 

分 类 号：G350[文化科学—情报学]