检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜南 Jiang Nan
出 处:《文献语言学》2024年第2期78-89,232,233,共14页
摘 要:跨語言的事實表明,語法項的形態與其語義、句法功能成反比。古漢語連詞“然”同樣由於形態簡單而功能複雜,除常用作轉折連詞外,還有承接連詞、讓步連詞以及話題標記等用法。且文獻顯示,單音連詞“然”的語法化早於複音連詞“然而、雖然”等的詞彙化。這無疑是對跨層構詞、詞組凝定成詞等傳統看法的挑戰,畢竟同義並列複合是中古時期最能産的構詞方式。究竟哪種演變方式才真實合理?本文試從古漢語連詞“然”獨特的音步特徵及句法語義個性出發,再探“然”語法化爲各類連詞的典型環境,並結合梵漢佛經對勘材料,重新還原多義連詞“然”的形成及其複音化進程。The fact of cross-language shows that the form of grammatical items is inversely proportional to their semantic and syntactic functions.In ancient Chinese,the conjunctive Ran(然)is also simple in form but complex in function.Besides its common usage as a transition conjunction,it also serves as a concession conjunction and topic marker.Literature suggests that the grammaticalization of the monophonic conjunctive Ran(然)is earlier than the lexicalization of the polyphonic conjunctives Raner(然而)and Suiran(雖然).This is challenges traditional views on word formation and phrase condensation into words across different layers.After all,synonymous juxtaposition and compound formation were the most productive modes of word formation during the Middle Ages.Which evolution mode is true and reasonable?This paper aims to explore this question by examining the unique phonetic characteristics,syntactic functions,and semantic personality of the ancient Chinese conjunctive Ran(然),as well as investigating its grammaticalization into various types of conjunctions through analysis of Sanskrit-Chinese Buddhist scriptures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249