检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛莉[1] 房冠辛 吴蓉 Xue Li;Fang Guanxin;Wu Rong(Department of Social and Cultural Teaching,Party School of CPC Jiangsu Committee,Nanjing 210009,China)
机构地区:[1]中共江苏省委党校社会和文化教研部
出 处:《江苏大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第6期67-79,共13页Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:江苏省社会科学基金重点项目(23JZA-009)。
摘 要:改革开放以来,我国城市社区日益走向陌生化和个体化,对此亟须建构合乎新时代需求的城市社区治理模式,进而实现“共建共治共享”的治理体系。从健全城市社区治理体系的视角出发,江苏省南京市Q区“两赋两强”和“双做双增”治理实践的案例研究表明:Q区通过基层党建的“红色赋能”引领城市社区治理创新改革,推进知行共建、情理联结、人民至上的治理探索,实现价值赋能、机制赋能、组织赋能三个赋能层次的发展进路,构筑理念认同、协同互惠、社会信任的“强关系”型社会生活共同体。在中国情境下依托党建引领社区治理助推城市社区重构新时代“熟人社会”的创新路径,为赋能特大城市的基层社区治理提供了可资借鉴的样本。Since the reform and opening up,China's urban communities have become increasingly unfamiliar and individualized,requiring a governance model in line with the new era so as to create a governance system involving all parties concerned.This paper approaches the governance practice of Q District,Nanjing City,Jiangsu Province from the perspective of perfecting China's urban communal governance.It is found that Q District facilitated the innovation and reform of urban communal governance through the “red empowerment” of grass-roots Party building that had successively promoted the evolution and development of three empowerment levels,including value empowerment,mechanism empowerment and organization empowerment,and built a community of “strong connections” with common ideas,and mutual help and trust.Thus,the innovative path of restructuring the urban “acquaintance society” in the new era guided by Party building in China provides a reference for the grass-roots communal governance in megacities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.143.110