中资企业海外发展保护的困境及建议——以TikTok为例  

On the Dilemma and Suggestions for the Protection of Chinese Enterprises in Overseas Development——A Case Study on TikTok

作　　者：王鸿飞 WANG Hong-fei(College of Law,Gansu University of Political Science and Law,Lanzhou 730000,Gansu)

机构地区：[1]甘肃政法大学法学院,兰州甘肃730000

出　　处：《陇东学院学报》2024年第6期103-107,共5页Journal of Longdong University

摘　　要：美国对TikTok发起的“剥离法案”严重违反国际法,此种行为严重伤害中美两国伙伴关系,同时也不利于双方企业贸易往来,亦为我国企业海外发展困境的缩影。根据美国法律规定,被制裁者可通过申请行政救济,并在行政救济穷尽时向联邦法院提起诉讼。通过其国内法及相关判例,结合国际法精神,探析此次“剥离法案”违宪源由。面对以美国为首的西方国家频繁发动的单边制裁,需要在现有国际法框架下积极寻找对策,反对“多边过时论”。同时要坚持对外开放的基本国策,积极参与国际治理,培养涉外人才,不断提升我国对外话语权。United States' Divestment Act initiated against TikTok violates international law,which seriously harms the partnership between China and the United States,and is also not conducive to the trade between enterprises on both sides,and is a microcosm of the overseas development difficulties of Chinese enterprises.Under the law of United States,sanctioned persons may apply for administrative relief and file a lawsuit in federal court when administrative relief is exhausted.Through its domestic laws and relevant precedents,combined with the spirit of international law,this paper explores the reasons for the unconstitutionality of the Divestment Act.In the face of the frequent unilateral sanctions launched by Western countries led by the United States,it is necessary to actively seek countermeasures under the existing framework of international law and oppose the “multilateral obsolescence theory”.At the same time,it is necessary to adhere to the basic national policy of opening up to the outside world,actively participate in international governance,cultivate foreign-related talents,and continuously enhance China's foreign discourse.

关 键 词：剥离法案 违宪 制裁 

分 类 号：D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]