检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王晓培 WANG Xiaopei(Faculty of English Language and Culture,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510420,China)
机构地区:[1]广东外语外贸大学英语语言文化学院,广东省广州市510420
出 处:《外语教学与研究》2024年第6期803-814,958,共13页Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目“汉语和班图语非串联式构词法的对比研究”(19CYY023)的资助。
摘 要:汉语和班图语虽然形态类型有别,但均为声调语言,且都存在丰富的名词重叠现象,为形态-音系交互模式和类型学的研究提供了重要的事实基础。本文从名词重叠的功能、音系结构以及基式与复式之间声调的对应关系三方面考察并对比这两类语言的名词重叠现象。研究发现:就功能而言,两类语言的名词重叠均有指小和名物化的功能,但指大和表达典型性的功能在班图语中更为显著;在音系结构方面,复式的音系形式与两类语言的音系类型特点有关,受制于具体语言对词干/词根的韵律要求;就复式与基式的声调对应关系而言,声调的复制既可伴随音段的复制,也可独立于音段的复制。Although Chinese and Bantu languages differ regarding morphological types,both are tone languages with a rich phenomenon of nominal reduplication.This provides an important empirical basis for the theoretical study of morpho-phonological interaction and linguistic typology.This study examines and compares the function and phonological structure as well as the Base-Reduplicant tonal correspondence of nominal reduplication in these two types of languages.This study derives the following findings:Regarding function,nominal reduplications in both languages serve to realize diminutive and nominalizing functions.However,augmentation and typicality are more prominent in Bantu.Regarding phonological structure,the phonological form of a reduplicant in each type of language is subject to prosodic requirements on stems/roots of a specific language.Regarding tonal correspondence between the base and reduplicant,tonal replication can accompany the replication of segments or occur independently of segmental replication.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.198.25