检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高天放 朱青 吴松 Gao Tianfang;Zhu Qing;Wu Song(China Auto Information Technology(Tianjin)Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin 300300)
机构地区:[1]中汽信息科技(天津)有限公司,天津300300
出 处:《汽车文摘》2024年第12期46-50,共5页Automotive Digest
摘 要:目前,重型载货车电动化发展迎来重要机遇期,构建以电能为主的绿色能源货运体系,成为交通运输行业货运低碳转型发展的共识。其中,货运典型场景的选择、新能源货车性能的匹配至关重要。基于总体拥有成本分析方法,对天津港南疆港区典型应用场景下传统燃油式、充电式纯电动、换电式纯电动(自持或租赁)等不同技术路线下重型载货车的经济性开展研究。研究发现,南疆港区应用场景中纯电动重型载货车比传统燃油重型载货车更具有成本优势,其中换电式纯电动重型载货车TCO成本更低。At present,the development of electrification of heavy-duty trucks has ushered in an important development opportunity.Building a green energy freight transport system based on electricity has become a consensus for the low-carbon transformation and development of freight transport in the transportation industry.Among them,the selection of typical freight scenarios and the matching of the performance of new energy trucks are crucial.Based on the overall cost analysis method,this article studies the economy of heavy-duty trucks under different technical routes such as traditional fuel,rechargeable pure electric,and exchangeable pure electric(self-owned or leased)in typical application scenarios in the Nangang Port area of Tianjin.This study finds that pure electric heavy-duty trucks in the Nangang Port area application scenario have cost advantages over traditional fuel heavy-duty trucks,with the exchangeable pure electric heavy-duty trucks having lower TCO costs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49