急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克危重症患者体外膜肺氧合支持下行急诊经皮冠脉介入治疗的可行性研究  

Feasibility study of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

作　　者：肖浩[1] 崔晓磊[1] 刘亮[1] 吕宝谱 张睿[1] 郑拓康 孟庆冰[1] 姚冬奇[1] 高恒波[1] 田英平[1] Xiao Hao;Cui Xiaolei;Liu Liang;Lyu Baopu;Zhang Rui;Zheng Tuokang;Meng Qingbing;Yao Dongqi;Gao Hengbo;Tian Yingping(Department of Emergency,the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050000,Hebei,China)

机构地区：[1]河北医科大学第二医院急诊医学科,河北石家庄050000

出　　处：《中国中西医结合急救杂志》2024年第4期438-441,共4页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care

基　　金：河北省医学科学研究(20221076)。

摘　　要：目的评估急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并心源性休克(CS)危重症患者体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)支持下行急诊经皮冠脉介入治疗(PCI)的可行性.方法回顾性分析2018年12月至2021年12月于河北医科大学第二医院急诊医学科住院的AMI合并CS患者的临床资料,包括性别、年龄、体质量指数(BMI);既往史(吸烟、冠心病、心律失常、糖尿病、高血压、高脂血症、脑血管病);急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)、入院后24h内最高血管活性药物评分(VIS);入院后24h内最差辅助检查值:血乳酸(Lac)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、总胆红素(TBil)、肌酐(Cr)、血清钾、左室舒张期末内径(LVEDD)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、行急诊PCI期间是否出现恶性心律失常或心搏骤停、是否完成PCI、30 d预后等.根据是否应用ECMO将患者分为ECMO组和非ECMO组,比较两组上述指标的差异.结果ECMO组与非ECMO组在性别、年龄、BMI、既往史、APACHEⅡ评分、VIS评分、入院后24h内最差辅助检查值等方面比较差异均无统计学意义;ECMO组行急诊PCI期间恶性心律失常或心搏骤停发生率和30d病死率均较非ECMO组均明显降低[行急诊PCI期间恶性心律失常或心搏骤停发生率:17.9%(7/39)比45.0%(9/20),30 d病死率:46.2%(18/39)比75.0(15/20),均P<0.05];ECMO组PCI完成率较非ECMO组明显升高[100.0%(39/39)比80.0%(16/20),P<0.05].结论AMI合并CS的危重症患者ECMO支持下行急诊PCI期间发生恶性心律失常或心搏骤停的风险和30d病死率均降低,PCI完成率高.在ECMO团队的保障下,ECMO支持下行急诊PCI是可行的.Objective To evaluate the feasibility of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO)support in critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI)and cardiogenic shock(CS).Methods Retrospective analysis of clinical data of AMI combined with CS patients admitted to the department of emergency of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from December 2018 to December 2021,including gender,age,body mass index(BMI),past history(smoking,coronary heart disease,arrhythmia,diabetes,hypertension,hyperlipidemia,cerebrovascular disease);acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ)score,highest vasoactive-inotropic score(VIS)within 24 hours of admission,the worst auxiliary examination values within 24 hours after admission:blood lactic acid(Lac),arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2),cardiac troponin I(cTnI),alanine aminotransferase(ALT),total bilirubin(TBil),creatinine(Cr),serum potassium,left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),presence of malignant arrhythmia or cardiac arrest during emergency PCI,completion of PCI,and the 30-day prognosis,etc.Patients were divided into an ECMO group and a non-ECMO group based on whether ECMO was applied,to analyze differences in the above indicators between the two groups.Results There were no statistically significant differences between the ECMO group and the non-ECMO group in terms of gender,age,BMI,past history,APACHEⅡ,VIS and the worst auxiliary examination value within 24 hours after admission.The incidence of malignant arrhythmia or cardiac arrest events and 30-day mortality rate during emergency PCI in the ECMO group were significantly lower than those in the non-ECMO group[the incidence of malignant arrhythmia or cardiac arrest during emergency PCI was 17.9%(7/39)vs.45.0%(9/20),and the 30-day mortality was 46.2%(18/39)vs.75.0%(15/20),both P<0.05].The completion rate of PCI in the ECMO group was significantly higher than that in the non-ECMO gro

关 键 词：体外膜肺氧合 急性心肌梗死 心源性休克 经皮冠脉介入治疗 

分 类 号：R542.22[医药卫生—心血管疾病]