检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李睿 LI Rui(Zhengzhou Intermediate People′s Court,Zhengzhou 450000,China)
出 处:《河南科技》2024年第21期112-115,共4页Henan Science and Technology
摘 要:【目的】司法实践中,认定发明创造是否系“主要利用单位物质技术条件”存在较多争议,特别是在涉及技术难点时,审判标准把握不一。本文探究司法实践中,尤其在涉及技术难点时,如何认定发明创造是否系“主要利用单位物质技术条件”。【方法】通过分析典型案件,找出问题症结,根据理论分析与实证研究相结合的方式,分析总结出“找准实质性特点、分析研发过程、甄别相应生产要素”的“三步法”判定步骤。【结果】该“三步法”判定步骤,可以有效解决是否系“主要利用单位物质技术条件”这一问题。【结论】依据该步骤对“主要“”次要”等事实因素进行判定,可以有效地统一裁判标准。[Purposes]In judicial practice,there are many disputes about whether the invention is"mainly utilizing the material and technical conditions of the unit",and especially when it comes to technical difficulties,the trial standard is different.Therefore,this paper explores how to determine whether the invention is"mainly utilizing the material and technical conditions of the unit"in judicial practice,especially when it comes to technical difficulties.[Methods]Through the analysis of typical cases,the crux of the problem is found out.According to the combination of theoretical analysis and empirical research,the“three-step”determination steps of“finding out the substantive characteristics,analyzing the research and development process,and screening the corresponding production factors”are analyzed and summarized.[Findings]The“three-step”determination step can effectively solve the problem of whether it is"mainly utilizing the material and technical conditions of the unit".[Conclusions]According to this step,the"primary","secondary"and other factual factors are judged,which can effectively unify the trial standard.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222