论著作权合法来源抗辩制度适用规则的优化  

On the Optimization of the Rules Applicable to the Legal Source Defence in Copyright Law

作　　者：安新源 AN Xinyuan(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450000,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450000

出　　处：《河南科技》2024年第21期120-125,共6页Henan Science and Technology

摘　　要：【目的】研究著作权合法来源抗辩制度的适用主体及过错认定规则,以在信息网络空间更好地适用合法来源抗辩制度。【方法】通过分析著作权合法来源抗辩制度的立法文本,并结合确保法律体系一致性、维护市场正常流通秩序、保护知识产品使用者利益要求,确立该制度的适用主体及过错认定规则。【结果】该制度所涉的责任并非无过错责任,其对过错的认定方式是过错推定。该制度适用主体以权利穷竭抗辩主体为限。【结论】应依据过错推定规则适用合法来源抗辩制度,出租者不应作为合法来源抗辩主体,销售者应属于合法来源抗辩主体,从属行为应纳入合法来源抗辩范畴。[Purposes]This paper studies the applicable subject and fault identification rules of the copyright legal source defense system,so as to better apply the legal source defense system in the information network space.[Methods]Through the analysis of the legislative text of the legal source defense system of copyright,combined with the requirements of ensuring the consistency of the legal system,maintaining the normal circulation order of the market,and protecting the interests of users of intellectual products,the applicable subject and fault identification rules of the system are established.[Findings]The liability involved in this system is not no-fault liability,and it’s presumption of fault.The subject of the system is limited to the subject of the exhaustion of rights defence.[Conclusions]The system of legitimate source defense should be applied according to the rule of presumption of fault.The lessor should not be the subject of legitimate source defense,the seller should belong to the subject of legitimate source defense,and the subordinate behavior should be included in the scope of legitimate source defense.

关 键 词：合法来源抗辩 过错推定 适用主体 权利穷竭抗辩 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]