论网络异化犯罪中刑法扩张解释的类型化限度  

On the Categorical Constraints of Extended Interpretation of Criminal Law in Network Alienation Crimes

作　　者：孙常啸 马松建[1] SUN Chang-xiao;MA Song-jian(Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2024年第11期47-52,共6页Journal of Harbin University

摘　　要：近年来,网络犯罪案件的刑法解释出现扩张倾向,其中构成要件、前置行政法规、兜底条款等扩张超过必要限度。以网络犯罪异化程度为标准进行实质划分,不同类型网络犯罪应设定不同刑法扩张解释限度:最大限度控制量变网络犯罪的扩张解释,禁止作出违反基本原则的扩大解释;适当控制实质评价构成要件与违法性行为模式变化的质变网络犯罪扩大解释;审慎判断形变网络犯罪。应确立类型化限制为主、等价性判断为辅的网络犯罪判断方法,同时发挥指导案例作用,建立典型不构罪清单,形成多方面综合的网络犯罪入罪排除机制。In recent years,the criminal law interpretation of cybercrime cases has shown a tendency to expand,with the expansion of constituent elements,pre-administrative regulations,and fallback clauses exceeding necessary limits.The substantive division should be based on the degree of alienation of cybercrime,and different types of cybercrime should be subject to different criminal law expansion interpretation limits:maximum control should be exercised over the expansion interpretation of quantitative cybercrime,and expansion interpretations that violate basic principles should be prohibited;expanding the explanation of qualitative changes in cybercrime by appropriately controlling the constituent elements of substantive evaluation and changes in illegal behavior patterns;carefully assess the transformation of cybercrime.We should establish a network crime judgment method that focuses on categorical constraints and is supplemented by equivalence judgments.At the same time,we should play a guiding role in case studies,establish a list of typical non-criminal offenses,and form a comprehensive mechanism for excluding cybercrime from multiple aspects.

关 键 词：网络犯罪 刑法解释 刑法扩张趋势 类型化限度 

分 类 号：D914.1[政治法律—刑法学]