检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘婧一 LIU Jingyi(Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine,Beijing 100101,China)
机构地区:[1]北京干细胞与再生医学研究院,北京100101
出 处:《科技和产业》2024年第22期130-136,共7页Science Technology and Industry
摘 要:通过梳理中国地方科技人才引进计划评审情况,归纳和总结了科技人才项目评审的一般做法,发现以分组同行评议为主流决策方式的人才项目评审面临不同组间评审主体差异的问题。基于此,提出了一种评前预防和评后修正相结合的解决方法。评审前通过评价尺度、专家权重等方法对专家差异进行事先控制,评审后通过正态秩分数法对评审主体差异进行均衡化处理,从而有效平衡了组内和组间的评审主体差异。随机模拟验证与实证案例表明,该方法能够在一定程度上平衡组间评审主体差异,有利于提高同行评议决策的科学性,对后续地方科技人才引进计划的立项评审工作具有一定的参考意义。By analyzing the current situation of local R&D talent projects in China,the general practices of local R&D talent project review were summarized,and the problem of differences in the assessment subject between groups that current peer review activities face was revealed.In order to equilibrating group error of assessment subject,a combined solution containing pre-review prevention and post-review correction was proposed.Before the review process,methods such as setting evaluation criterion and expert weights could be applied.After the review process,rank statistics method could be used to convert original scores into normally distributed rank scores for equalization,and then linearly transform rank scores back to the original interval distribution,which would effectively balance the differences in assessment subjects within and between groups.Random simulation and empirical practices show that this method can balance the differences of evaluation subjects between groups,which will help improving the objectivity of the score processing and providing certain reference to future local talent project review.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.133.22