中外藏学学科比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Tibetology between China and Foreign Countries

作　　者：万果[1] 王巳龙 Ban go;WANG Si-long

机构地区：[1]西南民族大学中华民族共同体学院、中华民族共同体研究院,成都610041

出　　处：《中国藏学》2024年第3期183-192,219,共11页China Tibetology

基　　金：西南民族大学2023年度中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目——高水平科研平台建设专项“‘一带一路’视域下中国与南亚文化交互研究”(项目编号:2023SPT13)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：当前藏学在国际学术视野下,已经具有十分庞大的研究队伍、较为成熟的学术对话平台、相对明确的学术范式和丰富多样的研究路径,是一门国际“显学”。中国藏学研究所取得的成绩在国际上产生了一定的影响,但目前其在国际藏学界的话语权仍有较大上升空间。较之海外藏学研究领域,中国藏学在国际藏学研究领域呈现出较为鲜明的中国特色。除了特有的围绕中国当下涉藏现实议题、区域治理、民生实践等展开的涉藏研究外,中国藏学研究从研究对象、视角偏好、学理范式等方面均与海外藏学呈现出较为显著的差异。这种差异的形成是中国特色哲学社会科学体系建构这一宏观背景在藏学学科当中投射的呈现。Tibetology, or Tibetan studies, currently have developed into a significant field of research within the international academic landscape, characterized by a substantial cohort of researchers, a relatively mature platform for scholarly communication, a clearly defined academic paradigm, and a diverse array of research methodologies It has emerged as a prominent discipline on the global academic stage The achievements of Tibetology in China have garnered a notable impact internationally;however, there remains significant potential for enhancing its discourse power within the global Tibetology community Compared to the field of Tibetology abroad, Tibetology in China exhibits a distinct Chinese characteristic in the international academic arena In addition to the unique research focused on contemporary issues related to Xizang, such as regional governance and livelihood practices, Tibetology in China shows significant differences from the overseas counterparts in terms of research subjects, preferred perspectives, and theoretical paradigms The emergence of these differences can be attributed to the broader context of the construction of the Chinese characteristic in philosophical and social science system, which is reflected within the discipline of Tibetology.

关 键 词：中国藏学 国际藏学 学科体系 比较研究 

分 类 号：C95-06[社会学—民族学]