两个文本体系,两种思想指向--以《三国志》等四种提要的比较为切入点  

A Comparative Study on the Reviews of Four Books,Including Records of the Three Kingdoms

作　　者：周积明[1] ZHOU Jiming(Institute of Chinese Ideological and Cultural History,Hubei University)

机构地区：[1]湖北大学,武汉430062

出　　处：《清史研究》2024年第6期1-14,共14页The Qing History Journal

摘　　要：四库提要的稿本、阁本、定本之间存在诸多差异,学界一般认为,这些差异的形成,主要是由于《四库全书》经过了撤换、增补等过程,四库提要反复改动,其间又有馆臣擅改,誊录监生删节、疏忽以及纪晓岚“笔削一贯”等因素掺入。但是,除以上因素外,四库提要的阁本和定本很可能是基于不同源文本而进行修改。正是从不同源文本出发,《三国志》《旴江集》《文章正宗》《古今纪要》四部著作的提要形成两个文本系统。一个是以文渊阁本提要、《四库全书总目》为主体,一个是以文溯阁本提要、文津阁本提要为主体。两个文本系统不仅文字不同,思想指向也有一定差异。There are numerous differences between the draft,cabinet,and final versions of the Siku Summary.The mainstream view is that these differences primarily arise from the processes of replacement,supplementation,and re-examination involved in the compilation of the“Complete Library of the Four Treasuries.”Consequently,the Siku Summary underwent repeated modifications,influenced by factors such as the unauthorized alterations by officials,omissions and oversights by copyists,and Ji Xiaolan’s consistent editing.However,beyond these factors,it is likely that the cabinet and final versions of the Siku Summary were revised based on different source texts.Starting from different source texts,the summaries for four works—“Records of the Three Kingdoms,”“Xijiang Collection,”“Orthodox Literature,”and“Comprehensive Chronicles of Ancient and Modern Times”—form two distinct textual systems.One system is primarily represented by the Wenyuan Pavilion summary and the“General Catalogue of the Complete Library of the Four Treasuries,”while the other is mainly represented by the Wensu Pavilion summary and the Wenjin Pavilion summary.These two textual systems not only differ in wording but also exhibit certain differences in ideological orientation.

关 键 词：《三国志》 《四库全书总目》 《四库全书》 文溯阁 纪晓岚 四库提要 文渊阁本 文津阁 

分 类 号：K249.3[历史地理—历史学]