检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林利平[1] 颜孙言 刘芳意 陈苹苹[1] 林加源 洪杨文 叶秀玉[1] LIN Liping;YAN Sunyan;LIU Fangyi;CHEN Pingping;LIN Jiayuan;HONG Yangwen;YE Xiuyu(Department of Pediatrics,Jinjiang Municipal Hospital,Jinjiang 362200,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]晋江市医院(上海市第六人民医院福建医院)儿科,福建晋江362200
出 处:《中国医学创新》2024年第33期121-125,共5页Medical Innovation of China
摘 要:目的:探究以早期肺功能监测为指导的干预对反复下呼吸道感染患儿的影响。方法:选择2022年9月—2023年12月晋江市医院收治的80例反复下呼吸道感染患儿,根据随机数字表法分为两组,各40例。对照组进行常规下呼吸道感染干预治疗,观察组则以早期肺功能监测为指导进行针对性干预。比较两组疾病控制总有效率、干预前后肺功能指标[呼气峰值流速(PEF)、第1秒用力呼气容积占预计值的百分比(FEV_(1)%pred)及?第1秒用力呼气容积占用力肺活量的比值(FEV_(1)/FVC)]及免疫状态指标[免疫球蛋白A(IgA)、免疫球蛋白G(IgG)、免疫球蛋白M(IgM)、补体C3、CD8^(+)、CD19^(+)、CD3^(+)及CD4^(+)]。结果:观察组疾病控制总有效率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,两组肺功能指标及免疫状态指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,观察组PEF、FEV_(1)%pred、FEV_(1)/FVC均显著高于对照组,CD8^(+)、CD19^(+)均显著低于对照组,IgA、IgG、IgM、补体C3、CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)均显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:以早期肺功能监测为指导的干预有助于反复下呼吸道感染患儿的疾病控制,调控其免疫状态,有助于患儿肺功能状态的改善。Objective:To explore the effects of intervention guided by early pulmonary function monitoring on children with recurrent lower respiratory tract infection.Method:A total of 80 children with recurrent lower respiratory tract infection treated in Jinjiang Municipal Hospital from September 2022 to December 2023 were selected,they were divided into two groups according to random number table method,with 40 cases in each group.The control group received routine intervention treatment for lower respiratory tract infection,and the observation group received targeted intervention guided by early pulmonary function monitoring.The total effective rate of disease control,pulmonary function indexes[peak expiratory flow rate(PEF),percentage of forced expiratory volume in the first second to the expected value(FEV_(1)%pred),ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity(FEV_(1)/FVC)]and immune status indexes[immunoglobulin A(IgA)and immunoglobulin G(IgG),immunoglobulin M(IgM),complement C3,CD8^(+),CD19^(+),CD3^(+)and CD4^(+)]were compared between the two groups.Result:The total effective rate of disease control in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before intervention,there were no significant differences in pulmonary function indexes and immune status indexes between the two groups(P>0.05).After intervention,PEF,FEV_(1)%pred and FEV_(1)/FVC in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group,CD8^(+)and CD19^(+)were significantly lower than those in control group,IgA,IgG,IgM,complement C3,CD3^(+)and CD4^(+)were significantly higher than those in control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Intervention guided by early pulmonary function monitoring is helpful for disease control,regulation of immune status and improvement of pulmonary function in children with recurrent lower respiratory tract infection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.193.52