涉外法治视角下我国《阻断办法》的完善进路  

Returning to the Essence of Law:on the Improvement of China’s“Blocking Rules”

作　　者：刘艳娜[1] 杨沁芸 LIU Yanna;YANG Qinyun(School of Humanities and Law,Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao 066004,China)

机构地区：[1]燕山大学文法学院,河北秦皇岛066004

出　　处：《燕山大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第6期52-59,共8页Journal of Yanshan University:Philosophy and Social Science

基　　金：教育部规划基金项目“中国阻断法的适用问题与完善进路”(23YJA820018)中期成果。

摘　　要：阻断法从创设之初就具有法律工具与博弈工具的双重属性。我国《阻断办法》对于博弈功能重视有余,司法实践中采取“严解释、不轻用”的态度,制度层面上《阻断办法》的各项内容并不易实施,作为其本质属性的法律功能难以发挥。《阻断办法》要想真正起到阻断外国法不当域外适用的效果,相关完善措施必须回归其法律本质,这亦是契合习近平总书记关于加强涉外法治工作的重要论述的必然路径。应当转变阻断法实施思维、细化各项制度安排,赋予我国阻断体系生命力,在积极与严格的实施中实现与不当域外扩张的外国法之间的抗衡。The blocking law has had legal tool and political bargaining attributes since its inception.China’s“Blocking Rules”attach more importance to the bargaining functions,adopting a“strict interpretation,cautious application”approach in judicial practice.Institutionally,the various measures are difficult to implement,hindering the realization of its legal function.In order for the Blocking Rules to truly have the effect of counteracting the improper extraterritorial application of foreign laws,relevant improvement measures must return to their legal nature,which is also an inevitable path that aligns with the concept of foreign-related rule of law proposed by Xi Jinping.Therefore,it is necessary to transform the implementation thinking of blocking laws,refine various institutional arrangements,give vitality to China’s blocking law system and rigorously counteract improper extraterritorial expansion of foreign laws through active and strict implementation.

关 键 词：涉外法治 阻断法 域外效力 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]