企业反垄断纠纷的可仲裁性研究——以伊利实业集团股份有限公司为例  

Research on the Arbitrability of Enterprise Anti-monopoly Disputes--Taking Yili Industrial Group Co.,Ltd.as an Example

作　　者：赵莉 ZHAO Li(Qinghai Minzhu University,Xining Qinghai 810007)

机构地区：[1]青海民族大学,青海西宁810007

出　　处：《中国乳业》2024年第11期176-180,共5页China Dairy

摘　　要：垄断行为对自由竞争市场秩序有很大危害性,而反垄断行程序解决,实践中有不同解决方式。仲裁程序具有自愿性、灵活性、专业性等特点,将反垄断纠纷纳入仲裁程序,不仅能很好发挥仲裁程序优越性,而且能更高效便捷处理反垄断纠纷案件。本文以伊利实业集团股份有限公司为例,分析合同签订、履行引发的确认垄断行为之诉是否适用合同约定仲裁条款,总结相关经验,为我国市场主体缔结合同条款提供反垄断经验,营造更自由、公平、有序市场,促进我国乳品市场持续健康发展。Monopolistic behavior is very harmful to the market order of free competition,and whether civil disputes arising from anti-monopoly behaviors can be resolved through arbitration procedures are resolved in different ways in practice.The arbitration procedure is voluntary,flexible and professional,and the inclusion of anti-monopoly disputes in the arbitration procedure can not only give full play to the advantages of the arbitration procedure,but also resolve anti-monopoly dispute cases more efficiently and conveniently.This paper took Yili Industrial Group Co.,Ltd.as an example to analyze whether the arbitration clause agreed in the contract can still be applied to the lawsuit for confirmation of monopolistic behavior caused by the signing and performance of the contract between dairy enterprises,summarized the relevant experience,and provided relevant anti-monopoly experience for the conclusion of contract clauses between dairy enterprises in China,so as to create a more free,fair and orderly market atmosphere,so as to better promote the sustainable and healthy development of China's dairy market.

关 键 词：反垄断 民事纠纷 可仲裁性 

分 类 号：F426.82[经济管理—产业经济] D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]