社区“党领共治”绩效差异的类型学分析  

A Typological Analysis of Performance Variations in Community's"Party-Led Co-Governance"

作　　者：原珂[1,2] 张莹 Yuan Ke;Zhang Ying

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学国家对外开放研究院 [2]石河子大学法学院 [3]中共河北省委党校国家治理教研部(电子政务研究中心)

出　　处：《江苏社会科学》2024年第6期120-129,I0004,共11页Jiangsu Social Sciences

基　　金：对外经济贸易大学优秀青年学者资助项目“中国城市社区发展治理创新研究”(21YQ20)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在党的领导下构建多元共治的社区治理共同体,已然成为新时代国家基层治理体系的基础性结构安排和基层治理能力现代化建设的重要内容。在一致性的结构安排下,各地社区在实践中却形成了差异化的治理绩效。何种因素催生了“党领共治”的绩效差异是核心问题所在。基于协同治理理论,从地方政府制度设计能力和社区党组织领导力两个维度构建了“党领共治”绩效的分析框架:地方政府的制度设计提供了明晰的引导和规则约束,是“党领共治”的外部推力;社区党组织的领导力是链接治理资源、实现“党领共治”的内部驱动力。同时,基于制度和领导力的差异化组合,区分了“形式主义、内部驱动、外部指导、内外统合”四种“党领共治”模式,并通过案例比较发现其绩效差异。其中,形式主义“党领共治”的绩效表现最差,内部驱动和外部指导型的“党领共治”绩效表现居中,内外统合型“党领共治”绩效表现最好且具有稳定性。对新时代党建引领社区治理绩效差异的科学阐释既有助于增进知识积累,也能为地方政府制度的优化和社区党组织领导力的提升提供经验借鉴。The construction of pluralistic co-governance community systems under the leadership of the Party has become both the fundamental structural layout in the national grassroots governance system and a crucial component in modernizing grassroots governance capabilities in the new era.Despite the uniform structural layout,communities across different regions have demonstrated varied governance performance outcomes.The key question lies in identifying the factors that generate these performance variations in"Party-led co-governance".Based on collaborative governance theory,this study constructs an analytical framework examining performance through two dimensions:local governments'institutional design capacity and community Party organizations'leadership capability.Local governments'institutional design provides clear guidance and regulatory constraints,serving as an external driving force,while community Party organizations'leadership functions as an internal drive linking governance resources and realizing"Party-led co-governance".Through differential combinations of institutional and leadership factors,the study distinguishes four modes of"Party-led co-governance":formalistic,internally-driven,externally-guided,and internally-externally integrated.Case comparisons reveal that formalistic"Party-led co-governance"demonstrates the poorest performance,internally-driven and externallyguided modes show moderate performance,while the internally-externally integrated mode achieves the best and most stable performance outcomes.This scientific interpretation of governance performance variations not only contributes to knowledge accumulation but also provides experiential reference for optimizing local government institutions and enhancing community Party organizations'leadership capabilities.

关 键 词：党领共治 多元协同 制度创新 治理绩效 基层治理 

分 类 号：D669.3[政治法律—政治学] D630[政治法律—中外政治制度] D267.7