检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张淇 ZHANG Qi(Law School of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030006,China)
出 处:《太原学院学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期58-70,共13页Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部青年基金项目(23YJC820053);2023年度山西省哲学社会科学规划课题(2023YY156)。
摘 要:数据已成为新的产权要素和产业基础,而具备了一定理性能力的生成式人工智能ChatGPT在大数据喂养、人为数据标识处理和信息再输出三个层次对个人信息权益构成了新的侵权范式。尽管《个人信息保护法》《网络安全法》等法律规范已确立起一系列个人信息保护手段,但在生成式人工智能服务与应用端仍面临着解释和适用上的难题。为此,我国需要在保障个人信息权益的前提下鼓励发展人工智能技术——在总体上要树立起基于风险的个人信息保护原则,并尝试以“风险预知—解构—化解”为基本路径,在微观上优化“知情-同意”规则,以“设计保护”原则强化企业内部自治,并灵活调整侵权责任追究机制。Data have long become a new element of property rights and industrial base,and ChatGPT,a generative AI with certain rational ability,has constituted a new infringement paradigm for personal information rights and interests at three levels:big data feeding,artificial data identification processing,and information re-output.Although the Personal Information Protection Law,Cyber Security Law and other legal norms have established a series of personal information protection measures,there are still difficulties in the interpretation and application of generative AI services and applications.China needs to encourage the development of AI on the premise of protecting the rights and interests of personal information.It is necessary to establish the principle of risk-based personal information protection,and try to take"risk prediction-deconstruction-resolution"as the basic path,optimize the"informed-consent"rule at the micro level,strengthen the internal autonomy of enterprises with the principle of"protection by design",and flexibly adjust the infringement liability mechanism.
关 键 词:《个人信息保护法》 ChatGPT 生成式人工智能 风险控制
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7