AIGC服务提供者版权侵权责任研究  

Research on Copyright Infringement Liability of AIGC Service Provider

作　　者：朱开鑫 ZHU Kaixin

机构地区：[1]腾讯研究院 [2]国家版权局网络版权产业研究基地,北京100101

出　　处：《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第6期39-49,共11页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：生成式人工智能的兴起引发了网络版权领域新的侵权纠纷类型与平台责任关注。在版权直接侵权层面,AIGC服务提供者并不必然构成演绎权侵权,但发生“模型记忆”时受信息网络传播权规制;在版权间接侵权层面,AIGC服务提供者版权替代责任的认定依赖于用户直接侵权的成立。内容呈现模式的封闭性决定了AIGC版权侵权判定的特殊性,但内容输出量级的放大效应客观增加了社会整体的版权侵权风险。为此,需要聚焦AIGC服务提供者注意义务的具体情形,设定科学的事前、事中与事后版权保护措施体系。The rise of generative artificial intelligence has triggered new types of copyright infringement disputes and con-cerns about platform liability in the field of online copyright.In terms of direct copyright infringement,AIGC service providers do not necessarily constitute an infringement of derivative right,however,when“model memory”occurs,it is regulated by the right to network information dissemination.In terms of indirect copyright infringement,the determination of copyright vicarious liabil-ity for AIGC service providers depends on the establishment of direct infringement by the user.The closed nature of content pre-sentation patterns determines the particularity of copyright infringement determination in AIGC,but the amplification effect of content output volume objectively increases the overall risk of copyright infringement in society.Therefore,it is necessary to fo-cus on the specific circumstances of the duty of care for AIGC service providers and establish a scientific system of copyright pro-tection measures in advance,during,and after the provision of services.

关 键 词：AIGC 版权 信息网络传播权 演绎权 直接侵权 间接侵权 注意义务 

分 类 号：TP18[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程] D9[自动化与计算机技术—控制科学与工程]