检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马芳[1] Ma Fang
机构地区:[1]青海民族大学,青海西宁810007
出 处:《青海民族大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期100-107,共8页Journal of Qinghai Minzu University:Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“祁连山国家公园脆弱生态环境保护与修复的跨区域法治协调机制研究”(项目编号:19BFX181);青藏高原环境与资源法学研究基地(国家民委人文社科重点研究基地)2024年基金项目的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:为了深入贯彻落实习近平生态文明思想和习近平法治思想,加强对生态环境和自然资源的有效保护和修复,恢复性司法理念逐渐被引入生态环境和资源保护领域并取得了明显的成效,多元化恢复性司法方式的实施最大限度地保护了受损的生态环境和自然资源,但由于实践中缺乏统一的法律依据及明确的司法裁量标准,在一定程度上影响到生态环境恢复性司法的有效推进。本文以祁连山国家公园为视角,通过对生态环境恢复性司法中存在问题的分析,探讨相应的解决思路和对策建议,以有效提升生态环境恢复性司法的整体效能,修复人与自然和谐共生的社会关系。In order to carry out Xi Jinping’s ecological civilization thoughts and Xi Jinping’s law-ruling thoughts and deeply strengthen the effective protection and restoration of the ecological environment and natural resources,the concept of restorative justice has gradually been introduced into the field of ecological environment and resource protection and has achieved significant results.The implementation of diversified restorative justice methods has maximized the protection of damaged ecological environment and natural resources.However,due to the lack of unified legal basis and clear judicial discretion standards in practice,to a certain extent,it affects the effective promotion of ecological environment restoration justice.This article takes the Qilian Mountain National Park as the perspective,analyzes the problems in the application of ecological environment restorative justice,explores corresponding solutions and policy suggestions,in order to effectively improve the overall efficiency of ecological environment restorative justice and restore the harmonious social relationship between humans and nature.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28