检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:申华平[1] 蒲子琛 Shen Hua-ping;Pu Zi-chen
机构地区:[1]北京理工大学,北京100081 [2]伦敦大学学院,英国伦敦WC1E 6BT
出 处:《青海民族大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期139-145,共7页Journal of Qinghai Minzu University:Social Sciences
摘 要:“彩砂坛城”作为藏传佛教密宗仪轨之一,在被纳入国家级非物质文化遗产名录后,其文化价值被系统评估、重构并文本化,进入官方主流话语体系之中。原本属于封闭且私密的宗教仪式的彩砂坛城,逐步转化为一种面向公众的开放性展演。非遗的本质涉及国家认同、地方文化、记忆传承、身份建构等关键主题。当非遗在不同“场域”和“语境”之中展演,不同观众基于个人视角和背景,产生不同的个体记忆,赋予非遗项目形态各异的文化认同和价值意义。本研究将通过不同主体在非遗“在场”中的话语、行动和博弈,呈现非遗作为一种公共项目如何被不同社会主体进行诠释、重构和符号化,分析在不同场域中非遗文化价值构建和认同机制的差异与矛盾,以及这些差异和矛盾产生的原因和可能的解决途径。The Sand Mandala,a pivotal Tantric ritual within Tibetan Buddhism,has been officially recognized and included in the National Intangible Heritage List,undergoing a comprehensive process of valuation,redefinition,and documentation.This process has facilitated its integration into mainstream discourse,marking its evolution from an esoteric,private practice to an openly accessible cultural display.Intangible cultural heritage,at its core,engages with crucial concepts such as national identity,local culture,the transmission of memory,and the construction of individual and collective identities.When intangible cultural heritage is performed in different“fields”and“contexts”,different viewers,based on their personal perspectives and backgrounds,generate distinct individual memories,bestowing the intangible cultural heritage projects with diverse cultural identities and significance.This research delves into the multifaceted processes through which intangible cultural heritage is engaged with and represented by various social actors,exploring the discourse,actions,and interplay among stakeholders within the context of intangible cultural heritage.It scrutinizes how diverse interpretations,reconstructions,and symbolization by different groups contribute to the nuanced landscape of cultural significance and identity associated with intangible cultural heritage.By investigating the variegated approaches to valuing and identifying intangible cultural heritage across distinct contexts,this study aims to uncover the underlying disparities and tensions.Additionally,it seeks to understand the origins of these differences and challenges,proposing potential strategies for addressing and harmonizing these divergences.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.195.19