“郑风不淫”:吴闿生《诗义会通》编纂的基点  

“Zheng Feng Is Not Licentious”:the Basis for the Compilation of Wu Kaisheng’s Shi Yi Hui Tong

作　　者：李坤成 LI Kuncheng(School of Literature,Henan University,Kaifeng 475000,China)

机构地区：[1]河南大学文学院,河南开封475000

出　　处：《郑州航空工业管理学院学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期57-62,共6页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：1920年代,关于《诗》的论争在学界愈发激烈。《诗序》不仅是《诗》经典化的关键,同时影响了千年来中国士大夫的思考与治学方式,至“五四”之后,成为“古史辨派”批判、否定的对象。吴闿生在1927年出版了《诗义会通》,他以“辨正”的眼光审视《诗序》。朱熹《诗集传》以“郑风淫”否定《诗序》的方式,被“古史辨派”推崇。吴闿生却提出“郑风不淫”,是对朱子的一次反动,更是对“古史辨派”否定、推倒《诗》经学地位行为的回应。“郑风不淫”是吴闿生关于郑风的基础判断,同样也是他整本书编纂的“基点”,是他与“古史辨”派讨论的基础。这个基点潜隐着他坚守传统的文化观与试图恢复“礼教”的治世观。In the1920s,the debate over the Book of Songs became increasingly intense in academia.The Preface to Poetry is not only the key to the classicization of Poetry,but also influenced the thinking and academic methods of Chinese literati for thousands of years.After the May Fourth Movement,it became the object of criticism and negation by the“Ancient History Debate School”.In1927,Wu Kaisheng published the Shi Yi Hui Tong and examined the Preface to Poetry with a“discerning”perspective.Zhu Xi’s Shi Ji Zhuan was praised by the Ancient History Debate School for its rejection of the Preface to Poetry in the form of“Zheng Feng’s licentiousness”.However,Wu Kaisheng’s proposal of“Zheng Feng is not licentious”was a reaction against Zhu Xi,and also a response to the ancient history discernment school’s denial and overthrow of the status of the study of the classics in Poetry“.Zheng Feng is not licentious”is Wu Kaisheng’s fundamental judgment on Zheng Feng,as well as the“basis”for his compilation of the entire book,and the basis for his discussions with the“Ancient History Debate School”faction.This foundation implies his adherence to traditional cultural views and his attempt to restore the concept of“propriety and education”in governing the world.

关 键 词：吴闿生 《郑风》 《诗义会通》 《诗集传》 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]