网络诽谤犯罪的刑法规制问题  

Problems of Criminal Law Regulation on Cyber Defamation Crime

作　　者：张敏 高明 李珂 ZHANG Min;GAO Ming;LI Ke(People’s Procuratorate of Qibin District,Hebi 458030,China)

机构地区：[1]鹤壁市淇滨区人民检察院,河南鹤壁458030

出　　处：《郑州航空工业管理学院学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期105-110,共6页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：互联网在为人们提供多样化的信息获取渠道的同时,也滋生了许多利用网络实施违法犯罪的行为。《刑法》虽已有相应的法律和司法解释对该行为进行规制,但仍存在诸如“情节严重”的量化标准存在争议、受害者取证困难以及缺乏对单位犯罪的规制等问题。基于此,提出在立法方面,把间接故意作为主观要件的认定范围,增设单位犯罪主体以及完善帮助取证的规定;在司法方面,将“明知仍散布”规定为诽谤罪的行为方式,司法解释附加“主观明知”和“情节严重”等条件进行限制,同时附加“主观明知”的判断标准和“情节严重”的具体情形等;在确定“情节严重”的认定标准时,应结合形式标准与实质标准进行认定。While the Internet provides people with diversified channels for obtaining information,it also breeds many illegal and criminal acts implemented through the network.Although criminal law already has corresponding laws and judicial interpretations to regulate this behavior,there are still problems such as disputes over the quantitative standard of“serious circumstances”,difficulties in obtaining evidence by victims,and lack of regulation on unit crimes.In terms of legislation,indirect intention can be included in the scope of determination of subjective elements,unit criminal subjects can be added,and provisions on helping to obtain evidence can be improved;in terms of judicature,“knowing and still spreading”can be stipulated as the act mode of the crime of defamation.Judicial interpretations can be restricted by adding conditions such as“subjective knowledge”and“serious circumstances”,and at the same time,judgment standards of“subjective knowledge”and specific circumstances of“serious circumstances”can be added;when determining the recognition standard of“serious circumstances”,it should be recognized in combination with formal and substantive standards.

关 键 词：网络诽谤 刑法规制 司法解释 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]