决议行为性质和效力的组织法面向  

NATURE AND VALIDITY OF THE RESOLUTION ACT IN THE CIVIL CODE IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEVEL

作　　者：薛鸿玉 尤佳[1] XUE Hongyu;YOU Jia(School of Law,Anhui University,Heifei 230601,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥230601

出　　处：《河南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期112-120,共9页Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(23FFXB068)。

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国民法典》第一百三十四条第二款将决议行为纳入“民事法律行为”的章节之下,并对其成立作出规定。但决议行为所属的团体组织性质使其法律主体并不只局限于法律规定的法人、非法人组织两类,还涉及业主大会、业主委员会等。关于决议行为的性质和效力仍存在争议,将其置于“民事法律行为”概念之下,是否与以意思表示为核心的民事法律行为本质一致需要进一步论证。决议行为建立在团体自治的法律基础之上,与传统法律行为存在差异,对决议行为制度效力规则的逻辑建构并不能完全依归法律行为制度。从目的解释论的视角看,处理决议行为效力瑕疵可分别依决议的团体类别和决议内容的具体面向进行类型化规制。Paragraph 2 of Article 134 of the Civil Code of the People′s Republic of China includes the act of resolution under the chapter of"Civil Legal Act"and provides for its establishment.However,the nature of the group organization to which the resolution act belongs makes its legal subject not only limited to the legal person and unincorporated organization as stipulated by law,but also more broadly involves the owners′general meeting,owners′committee and so on.The dispute about the nature and validity of the act of resolution is endless,and whether it is consistent with the essence of the civil legal act centered on the expression of intent needs to be further demonstrated within the notion of civil legal act.The act of resolution is based on the legal foundation of group autonomy,which is different from the traditional legal act in many ways,so the logical construction of the validity rules of the act of resolution cannot be completely dependent on the legal act system.From the perspective of purpose interpretation theory,its defective validity can be dealt with according to the type of group and the specific orientation of the content of the resolution.

关 键 词：决议行为 法律行为 意思表示 效力瑕疵 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]