LEED-CI V3 AND V4 GOLD PROJECTS FOR OFFICE SPACES:THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SHANGHAI AND CALIFORNIA  

作　　者：Svetlana Pushkar 

机构地区：[1]Department of Civil Engineering,Ariel University,Israel [2]Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning,Technion Israel Institute of Technology,Haifa,Israel

出　　处：《Journal of Green Building》2021年第4期29-43,共15页绿色建筑学报（英文）

摘　　要：The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEED)rating system is cur-rently progressing from version 3(V3)to 4(V4)with the aim of reducing environ-mental damage in the global construction sector.The LEED Commercial Interiors(LEED-CI)subsystem is widely used for office spaces,particularly in Shanghai and California.Comparing Shanghai and California in terms of LEED-CI projects can shed light on the ability of the LEED-CI subsystem to adapt to local green building standards and local environmental conditions.The aim of this study was to assess the difference between V3 and V4 LEED-CI Gold office projects using a comparison between Shanghai and California.The US Green Building Council and the Green Building Information Gateway databases were used to source LEED-CI V3 and V4 Gold office projects.The natural logarithm of the odds ratio and Fisher’s exact 2×2 tests with a mid p-value were used to evaluate the binary data,while the Cliff’sδand exact Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were used to evaluate the ordinal data.The results show no difference between Shanghai and California in terms of LEED-CI V3 Gold office projects in the five main LEED-CI categories.The shift from V3 to V4 LEED-CI Gold office projects is increasing the difference between Shanghai and California in terms of the following LEED-CI categories:location and transporta-tion,water efficiency,energy and atmosphere,and materials and resources.Therefore,as compared to V3,V4 for LEED-CI Gold office projects demonstrated greater adaptability to local green building standards and environmental conditions.

关 键 词：LEED-CI V3 LEED-CI V4 SHANGHAI California 

分 类 号：TP3[自动化与计算机技术—计算机科学与技术]