检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李凤章[1] Li Fengzhang
机构地区:[1]上海大学法学院
出 处:《东方法学》2024年第6期18-27,共10页Oriental Law
摘 要:土地权利研究应当关注“赋权”问题。现代产权制度的本质,并不在于国家是否保留土地所有权,而在于国家是否采取了契约化赋权的方式,并在此基础上形成了土地产权的契约观,从而建构一种“开放包容”的土地利用秩序。中国在改革开放后,以签订土地使用权出让合同的形式重建土地财产权,恰是采取了契约化赋权方式,并根据社保纳入情况,不断扩展契约化赋权的范围。这一做法有利于维护产权稳定,有利于树立契约型税理观,有利于强化民法对国家治理的作用,对于社会主义法治建设具有重要的积极意义。Research on land rights should focus on the issue of"empowerment".The essence of a modern property rights system does not lie in whether the state retains ownership of land,but in whether the state adopts a contractual empowerment approach,which results in a contractual view of land property rights and thus contributes to an"open and inclusive"land use system.After China's reform and opening-up,the reestablishment of land property rights through the conclusion of the contract for the assignment of the right to use the land precisely reflects this contractual empowerment approach.Its scope has been continuously expanded based on the inclusion of social security.This practice helps to maintain the stability of property rights,establish a contract-based taxation system,strengthen the role of civil law in state governance,and exert a significant positive influence on the construction of the socialist rule of law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.19.55.254