检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Destika Cahyana Agus Hadiarto Irawan Diah Puspita Hati Mira Media Pratamaningsih Vicca Karolinoerita Anny Mulyani Sukarman Muhammad Hikmat Fadhlullah Ramadhani Rachmat Abdul Gani Edi Yatno R.Bambang Heryanto Suratman Nuni Gofar Abraham Suriadikusumah
机构地区:[1]Research Center for Food Crops,Research Organization for Agriculture and Food,National Research and Innovation Agency,Indonesia [2]Research Center for Behavioral and Circular Economics,Research Organization for Governance,Economy,and Community Welfare,National Research and Innovation Agency,Indonesia [3]Research Center for Estate Crops,Research Organization for Agriculture and Food,National Research and Innovation Agency,Indonesia [4]Research Center for Geoinformatics,Research Organization for Electronics and Informatics,National Research and Innovation Agency,Indonesia [5]Soil Science Department,Faculty of Agriculture,Sriwijaya University,Indonesia [6]Soil Science Department,Faculty of Agriculture,Padjadjaran University,Indonesia
出 处:《Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences》2024年第1期146-153,共8页地学人工智能(英文)
摘 要:Since its arrival in late November 2022,ChatGPT-3.5 has rapidly gained popularity and significantly impacted how research is planned,conducted,and published using a generative artificial intelligence approach.ChatGPT-4 was released four months later and became more popular in November 2023.However,there is little study about the perception of scientists of these chatbots,especially in soil science.This article presents the new findings of a brief research investigating soil scientists’responses and perceptions towards chatbots in Indonesia.This artificial intelligence application facilitates conversation-based interactions in text format.The study evaluated ten ChatGPT answers to fundamental questions in soil science,which has developed into a normal science with a mutually agreed-upon paradigm.The evaluation was carried out by seven soil scientists recognized for their expertise in Indonesia,using a scale of 1-100.In addition,a questionnaire was distributed to soil scientists at the National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia(BRIN),universities,and Indonesian Soil Science Society(HITI)members to gauge their perception of ChatGPT’s presence in the research field.The study results indicate that the scores of ChatGPT answers range from 82.99 to 92.24.ChatGPT-4 is better than both the paid and free versions of ChatGPT-3.5.There is no significant difference between the English and Indonesian versions of ChatGPT-4.0.However,the perception of general soil scientists about the level of trust is only 55%.Furthermore,80%of soil scientists believe that chatbots can only be used as digital tools to assist in soil science research and cannot be used without the involvement of soil scientists.
关 键 词:Artificial intelligence ChatGPT Soil science TOOLS PARADIGM
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177