检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗丹 Luo Dan(College of Humanities and Social Scienses,Xi'an Polytechnic University,Xi'an,Shaanxi,710699)
机构地区:[1]西安工程大学人文社会科学学院,陕西西安710699
出 处:《市场周刊》2024年第34期158-162,共5页Market Weekly
摘 要:《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》新增的个人信息保护负责人制度备受关注,其与欧盟《通用数据保护条例》(《GDPR》)中数据保护官(DPO)制度相似,但DPO制度起步早,具体规定更为完善,分析其优势对中国维护数据安全及促进经济发展具有重要意义。文章通过梳理《GDPR》《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》《个人信息安全规范》,发现个人信息保护负责人制度还存在关键用语表述不一致等问题,进而思考如何将DPO制度的优势融入个人信息保护负责人制度。The new personal information protection officer system in the“People's Republic of China Personal Information Protection Law”has attracted a lot of attention,which is similar to the data protection officer(DPO)system in the European Union's“General Data Protection Regulation”(“GDPR”)in terms of its functions and other aspects.However,the DPO system has started earlier,and its specific provisions are more complete,so analyzing its advantages is of great significance to China's safeguarding of data security and promotion of e⁃conomic development.By combing the“GDPR”,the“People’s Republic of China Personal Information Protection Law”,and the“Code of Personal Information Security”,the article finds that the DPO system still has problems such as inconsistencies in the expression of key terms,and then considers how to integrate the advantages of the DPO system into the personal information protection officer system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127