《校勘学方法论》所见胡适校勘学思想平议——兼论其对王念孙理校成果的批评  

A Review of Hu Shi's On the Methodology of Textual Criticism-Along with a Discussion of His Criticism of Wang Niansun's Achievements in Emendation

作　　者：张锦少[1] CHEUNG Kam-siu(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hongkong 999077,China)

机构地区：[1]香港中文大学中国语言及文学系,中国香港999077

出　　处：《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期22-33,共12页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国香港研究资助局优配研究金资助项目“新见北京大学藏王念孙手稿的古音与古籍研究计划”(2110413)的研究成果。

摘　　要：胡适是近代中国的学术巨擘,对清代学术的研究可谓继梁启超以后的第一人,他在1930年代撰作的《校勘学方法论》中对王念孙的理校成果持批评的态度,而此文原稿现藏台湾近代史研究所档案馆。通过比对草稿与定稿所见删乙改订之迹,配合胡适手稿、书信、日记等材料,尝试考见胡适校勘学思想的学术脉络与嬗变之端倪,并以中西校勘学比较为参照,辅以近世出土文献材料与王念孙理校成果的比对,评骘胡适校勘“重对校,轻理校”思想之得失。Hu Shi stands as a prominent figure in modern Chinese scholarship,with his contributions to the study of Qing dynasty intellectual history being second only to those of Liang Qichao.In his 1930s work,On the Methodology of Textual Criticism,Hu adopted a critical perspective on Wang Niansun's achievements to“emendation”.The original manuscript of this work is currently preserved in the archives of the Institute of Modern History in Taiwan.By comparing the draft and final versions of the text,and through an analysis of deletions and revisions,this study,drawing upon Hu Shi's manuscripts,correspondence,diaries,and other primary materials,seeks to trace the intellectual evolution of his approach to textual criticism.Furthermore,by situating Hu's thought within a broader comparative framework that contrasts Chinese and Western methodologies of textual criticism,and by incorporating recently unearthed documents alongside an assessment of Wang Niansun's achievements in rational collation,this paper critically appraises the strengths and limitations of Hu Shi's prioritization of“collation”over“emendation”.

关 键 词：校勘学理论 胡适 王念孙 20世纪中国学术史 

分 类 号：G256.3[文化科学—图书馆学]