检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡海波[1] 刘佳璇 丁冬霞 周红卫 陈凤 刘鑫宇 马冰 胡超 HU Haibo;LIU Jiaxuan;DING Dongxia;ZHOU Hongwei;CHEN Feng;LIU Xinyu;MA Bing;HU Chao(Co-Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,Jiangsu,China;Geological Environment Exploration Institute of Jiangsu Province,Nanjing 211100,Jiangsu,China;Jiangsu Hydraulic Research Institute,Nanjing 210017,Jiangsu,China)
机构地区:[1]南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心,江苏南京210037 [2]江苏省环境地质调查大队,江苏南京211100 [3]江苏省水利科学研究院,江苏南京210017
出 处:《中南林业科技大学学报》2024年第11期58-69,共12页Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology
基 金:江苏省太湖流域重要生态功能区生态地质环境综合调查项目(2200113);江苏省碳达峰碳中和科技创新专项资金项目(BE2022305);国家林业和草原局江苏长江三角洲森林生态系统定位研究项目(2022132077);常州市生态绿城建设研究专项(2021-108)。
摘 要:森林在全球碳循环中扮演着关键角色,不仅有助于减缓气候变化,还在改善生态环境、促进社会经济可持续发展等方面发挥着重要作用。虽然以往的研究也探讨了森林固碳计量方法,但大多数集中在地上部分,且缺乏对基础理论的深入探讨。本研究针对前人研究的不足,从基础理论分析出发,探讨森林固碳的特点、过程及其影响机制,重点分析了植物、土壤和凋落物的固碳计量方法。综述了各方法在不同测算尺度下的应用效果,系统比较了各方法的优势和局限性。最后,讨论了当前研究重点和发展趋势。研究表明,各种森林固碳计量方法皆有一定的局限性,估算精度各异。因此,研究者应根据现有数据、计量尺度和精度需求,合理选择最适宜的计量方法。本文有助于深入理解森林固碳机制、掌握森林固碳计量方法,可为森林经营管理和应对气候变化策略提供科学依据。Forests play a critical role in the global carbon cycle,and their carbon sequestration not only contributes to climate change mitigation,but also improves the ecological environment and promotes sustainable social economic development.Although previous studies have also explored the measurement methods of forest carbon sequestration,most of them have focused on the above-ground sequestration and lacked in-depth discussion of the basic theories.Aiming at the shortcomings of previous studies,this study discussed the characteristics,processes and influencing mechanisms of forest carbon sequestration based on basic theoretical analysis.We focused on the analysis of carbon sequestration measurement methods for plants,soils and litter,summarized the application effects of each method at different measurement scales,systematically compared the advantages and limitations of each method.Finally,we discussed main topic of the current research and the development trend.This study showed that all forest carbon sequestration measurement methods had certain limitations and the estimation accuracy varied.Therefore,researchers should reasonably choose the most appropriate measurement method according to the existing data,measurement scale and accuracy requirements.This paper contributes to an in-depth understanding of forest carbon sequestration mechanisms and methodological principles,and provides a scientific basis for forest management and climate change response strategies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.28.158