检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董祥宇 Dong Xiangyu
机构地区:[1]浙江农林大学文法学院、浙江农林大学乡村振兴研究院
出 处:《法商研究》2024年第6期52-67,共16页Studies in Law and Business
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(21&ZD202)。
摘 要:在数字经济快速发展的当下,网络慈善平台作为互联网慈善的新型服务提供者,存在很多值得思考与探讨的问题。我国虽然通过了与慈善活动相关的法律规范,但对网络慈善平台的属性及分类并未明确,进而造成当前网络慈善平台在筹资行为过程中,存在强弱规定不平衡、社会法融合属性限制、责任承担主体不明晰的困境。出现这些困境的实质是慈善活动在调动社会公益积极性时,无法在参与慈善各主体间形成有效合理互动的信任关系。究其原因,主要与信任理论中系统信任的形成过程、社会互动信任共识关系、信任价值交换失衡等具有密切关联性。为此,可以从设立监管触发标准、构建合理主体互动关系、明确责任承担原则标准3个方面来纾解法律规制的困境。As a new service provider of internet charity, online charity platform is still worth thinking and discussing at the time of rapid development of digital economy. Although our country has passed legal regulations related to charitable activities, it has not clearly defined the attributes and classifications of online charitable platforms. This has led to an imbalance in the strength of regulations, limitations of social legal attributes, and ambiguity regarding the responsible parties in the fundraising activities of current online charitable platforms. The essence of these dilemmas is that the charitable activities cannot form effective and reasonable interaction and trust relationship among all the participants when mobilizing the enthusiasm of social commonweal. The reasons are closely related to the formation of systematic trust, the mutual understanding of social interaction and the unbalanced exchange of trust value in the trust theory. Therefore, we can alleviate the dilemmas of legal regulation from three aspects: establishing regulatory triggering standards, constructing reasonable interactive relationship among entities, clarifying the principles and standards of responsibility allocation.
分 类 号:D632.9[政治法律—政治学] D922.182.3[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13