检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许磊 Xu Lei
机构地区:[1]天津航空机电有限公司
出 处:《安全与电磁兼容》2024年第6期54-58,共5页Safety & EMC
基 金:中航工业2022-创新-1001。
摘 要:使用电磁仿真软件比较了电磁屏蔽效能评估的辐射源内置法和外置法,分析了它们在1~500 MHz频率范围内计算得到的屏蔽效能,并在150 MHz进行了实际屏蔽效能测试以验证仿真结果。结果表明,采用辐射源内置法的仿真能更准确地考虑屏蔽体内部的电磁条件,得到较低但更真实的屏蔽效能。此外,研究还发现高频段屏蔽效能急剧下降的原因与屏蔽体的谐振有关,在内部电路设计中应避免电子设备的工作频率与屏蔽体谐振频率接近,以防止电磁泄漏的加剧。研究结果有助于研究人员深刻理解电磁屏蔽效能仿真方法及它们在实际应用中的适用性。This study employs electromagnetic simulation software to compare two methods for evaluating electromagnetic shielding effectiveness:the internal and the external radiation source method.The analysis covers the shielding effectiveness computed within the frequency range of 1 to 500 MHz,alongside empirical tests conducted at 150 MHz to validate the simulation results.The results indicate that the internal radiation source method yields a more accurate representation of the electromagnetic conditions within the shielding structure,resulting in lower yet more realistic shielding effectiveness values.Furthermore,the research identifies a significant decline in shielding effectiveness at higher frequencies,which correlates with the resonance of the shielding body.It is recommended that internal circuit designs avoid aligning the operating frequency of electronic devices with the resonant frequency of the shielding structure to mitigate the risk of increased electromagnetic leakage.These results contribute to a deeper understanding of electromagnetic shielding effectiveness simulation methods and their practical applicability.
分 类 号:TN03[电子电信—物理电子学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.124