“彷徨的父亲”与历史连续性——以《罗慕拉》和《丹尼尔·德龙达》为中心  

The “Wandering Father” and Historical Continuity in Romola and Daniel Deronda

作　　者：唐嘉薇 Tang Jiawei(School of International Studies,University of International Business and Economics)

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学英语学院,北京100029

出　　处：《外国文学》2024年第6期49-61,共13页Foreign Literature

基　　金：对外经济贸易大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(20QD30,ZD5-04)。

摘　　要：乔治·爱略特的作品对多方面话题的呈现都蕴含着历史思维。而她的历史观在批评界一直难有定论,进步信念和保守态度共存在其作品里,并带来张力。实际上,爱略特关于何为真正发展的思考使其历史观中的复杂倾向彼此形成了紧密融合。本文透过《罗慕拉》和《丹尼尔·德龙达》中“彷徨的父亲”这一形象,挖掘传统和连续性在爱略特发展观中的重要意义,并进一步指出,爱略特心中真正的社会发展是在“重演”中扬弃传统的辩证式发展,她描写先人的悲剧性努力意在唤醒读者身为重演者的自觉。The works of George Eliot depict various aspects of society from a historical perspective. Eliot's view of history, therefore, is a crucial topic, yet it remains controversial among critics. A progressive belief coexists with conservative ideas, creating tension in Eliot's works. In fact, these seemingly contradictory tendencies are vitally connected by Eliot's concern with the nature of true social development. Through the key image of the “wandering father” in Romola and Daniel Deronda, the significance of tradition and historical continuity in Eliot's understanding of development is revealed. Moreover, it becomes clear that Eliot conceives true social development as a form of dialectic “recurrence”achieved through the sublation of tradition. Eliot presents the tragic efforts of pioneers to inspire her readers to initiate a historical “recurrence” of reformist endeavors.

关 键 词：乔治·爱略特 《罗慕拉》 《丹尼尔·德龙达》 历史连续性 

分 类 号：I561[文学—其他各国文学]