机构地区:[1]西南大学经济管理学院 [2]复旦大学经济学院
出 处:《中国农村观察》2024年第6期122-145,共24页China Rural Survey
基 金:重庆市社会科学规划英才计划项目“乡村振兴视域下脱贫人群内生发展能力提升研究”(编号:2022YC031);清华大学中国农村研究院博士论文奖学金项目“收入不平等对农户集体行动的影响效应、机制分析与福利后果研究”(编号:202321);西南大学创新研究2035先导计划(编号:SWUPilotPlan028)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:乡村善治不仅要关注包容性增长,也要摆脱集体行动困境,打造共建、共治、共享的治理格局。本文构建了包容性增长影响非经济性集体行动的理论分析框架,基于中国劳动力动态调查数据(CLDS),采用广义Bonferroni曲线度量包容性增长水平,通过精准扶贫政策实施这一工具变量识别包容性增长与非经济性集体行动的因果效应及其影响机制,并从贫困个体、贫困区域和扶贫效果三个维度探讨精准扶贫政策实施的非经济效应。研究发现:第一,包容性增长促进了农户参与非经济性集体行动。对农户而言,家庭收入越低、成员越多、土地经营面积越大、所在村庄规模越小,包容性增长对农户参与非经济性集体行动的促进作用越强。第二,包容性增长可通过提高农户互助水平和人际信任程度增强村庄动员能力和和谐程度,促进农户参与非经济性集体行动。第三,精准扶贫政策实施不仅有利于提高包容性增长水平,还有非经济效应。而且,包容性增长更有利于推动原贫困户、扶贫区域和扶贫效果好省份的农户参与非经济性集体行动。本文研究提供了包容性增长影响非经济性集体行动的理论逻辑和微观证据,能为政府制定促进包容性增长和村庄公共事物治理的政策提供有益参考。Good govermance in rural areas should not only focus on inclusive growth but also solve the collective action dilemma,creating a governance framework of co-building,co-goverming,and sharing public affairs.This paper constructs a theoretical analysis framework that examines how inclusive growth affects non-economic collective action.Based on the China Labor Dynamics Survey(CLDS)data,the study uses the Generalized Bonferroni Curve measurement framework to assess the level of inclusive growth.It employs the targeted poverty alleviation policy as an instrumental variable to identify the causal effect and its mechanism between inclusive growth and non-economic collective action.The study also explores the non-economic effects of implementing targeted poverty alleviation policies from three dimensions:individual poverty,regional poverty,and the effectiveness of poverty alleviation.The findings are as follows.First,inclusive growth promotes farmers'participation in non-economic collective action.For farmers,the lower the household income,the larger the family size,the greater the operational area,and the smaller the village size,the stronger the promoting effect of inclusive growth on farmers'participation in non-economic collective action.Second,inclusive growth enhances the level of mutual assistance and interpersonal trust among farmers,thereby strengthening the mobilization capacity and harmony of villages,and promoting farmers participation in non-economic collective action.Third,the implementation of targeted poverty alleviation policy not only helps improving the inclusive growth levels but also has non-economic effects.Moreover,inclusive growth is more conducive to promoting the participation in non-economic collective action of rural households in the original poverty households,poverty alleviation regions,and provinces with good poverty alleviation outcomes.This paper provides theoretical logic and micro-evidence on how inclusive growth affects non-economic collective action,offering valuable references for go
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...