梁启超“先秦无所谓史学”之论探析——兼论中国早期史学发展问题  

An Analysis of Liang Qichao’s Theory of“No History in the Pre⁃Qin Period”:On the Development of Early Chinese Historiography

作　　者：高长宇 Gao Changyu

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学历史学院

出　　处：《中国文化研究》2024年第4期56-65,共10页Chinese Culture Research

摘　　要：我国史学起源的探索以及早期史学概念的界定等问题,是近年来史学史学科回顾与发展,仍需着重考究的核心内容之一。早在一百年前梁启超曾提出“先秦无所谓史学”的观点,此论并非唐突的否定,而是其对史学概念的慎重考量。我们如果想要界定处于文明初期的史学概念问题,其实需先从人类的历史意识与史学意识等更早的概念讲起,才能逐步的理解其嬗变之路。此外,百家争鸣的诸子学繁荣,则是在当时的史学成果基础之上生发而来的,诸子学派多以阐发历史经验的方式,获取对现实的指导策略,进而达到经世致用的现实目的。故在文明草创之期的先秦时代,史学与诸子之学难免存在着一定的生发、继承、交融等关系在其中。The exploration of the origin of Chinese historiography and the definition of early historiographical concepts are core focuses of the recent review and development of the history of Chinese historiography,which still require attention and study.As early as a hundred years ago,Liang Qichao proposed the view that“pre⁃Qin has nothing to do with historiography.”Although this assertion may seem like an abrupt denial,it actually reflects insightful considerations.If we want to define the problem of historical concepts in the early stage of civilization,we should begin with earlier concepts such as human historical consciousness before we can gradually understand their evolutionary path.In addition,the flourishing philosophy schools have emerged from the roots of history,and scholars often employ methods of interpreting historical experiences to derive strategic guidance for contemporary issues,ultimately achieving the practical goal of applying historical insights to the modern world.Therefore,in the pre⁃Qin era,when civilization was inaugurated,historiography and scholarly studies inevitably existed within a context of development,inheritance,and even entanglement.

关 键 词：梁启超 先秦 史学 史学意识 

分 类 号：K2[历史地理—历史学]