“景慈证母案”与“费羊皮卖女案”之比较——兼及萧梁、北魏诉讼文化之同异  

Comparison of the"Jingci Proving Mother Case"and the"Selling Daughter for Sheepskin Case"——Also Addressing the Similarities and Differences in the Litigation Cultures of the Xiao Liang and Northern Wei

作　　者：李俊强[1] LI Jun-qiang(Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan,China,411105)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《广东开放大学学报》2024年第5期49-55,共7页JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY

基　　金：湘潭大学教学改革项目“《中国法律史》案例教学法研究”(0429-2904085);湘潭大学人才引进项目“北魏政统之汉化与法律体系之建构”(04KZ-KZ08090)。

摘　　要：萧梁“景慈证母案”早于北魏“费羊皮卖女案”整整10年,两案都是案中有案:既是一般刑案又牵涉亲伦案件。法律规定一旦与关乎伦常的案件相关联,极易产生纷争,有关“情理”的考量就会成为影响案件走向的最大变量。从案件走向可以发现两朝诉讼文化之别,可以体悟两朝法律制度趋同的倾向。礼教高于法律已是中古时代的基本常识,以孝义亲伦的名义裹胁、绑架律法的现象渐成司法常态。The Xiao Liang"Jingci Proving Mother Case"predates the Northern Wei"Selling Daughter for Sheepskin Case"by a full 10 years.Both cases are examples of a case within a case:they are not only general criminal cases but also involve familial matters.Legal provisions stipulate that once a case is linked to familial relationships,disputes are likely to arise,and considerations of"rationale"become the most significant variable affecting the direction of the case.From the progression of the cases,one can observe the differences in litigation culture between the two dynasties and recognize the tendency toward convergence in their legal systems.It is already common knowledge in the medieval era that moral teachings take precedence over law,and the phenomenon of coercing and hijacking the law under the guise of filial piety and familial obligations has gradually become the norm in judicial practice.

关 键 词：萧梁 北魏 景慈证母案 费羊皮卖女案 诉讼文化 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]